The man named Murakami as I understand it

Ephraim 2022-03-15 09:01:10

The man I understood as Murakami was a novelist trying to express the unreasonableness of human beings. This is where human beings are different from machines. In the final analysis, I am also an existence that does not trust the structure of human beings. As medically said, every few days we replace all the cells in our body. Imagine one cell shaking hands with another to say goodbye, and think of it as a 24-hour convenience store shift where waiters never repeat their faces. Our confirmation of ourselves, the confirmation of our only self-consciousness, is not necessarily a form of self-hypnosis. When this hypnosis fails, perhaps multiple personalities begin to breed.
Those who imitate Murakami can only imitate his side forever, and may not be able to imitate his profound doubts about human beings. And this doubt is also nothing more than a certain aspect of his novel world. I haven't read the novel, but it doesn't matter, we're just watching a movie that pays homage to Murakami, it's a tribute, it's not a parody, it's different. We also salute our parents, our teachers, and the travelers who helped you. Saluting is such a thing, it is a kind of gratitude.
People who know how to be grateful can be friends.
I started writing film reviews many years ago, and then I wrote less, sometimes I didn't want to talk, sometimes I didn't have anything to say. Or, there are moments like that when you finish your conversation with yourself. Once it's done, there's no need to narrate it to others, as the content of the conversation is quickly lost. Just like a dream you can barely recall when you wake up in the morning, you forget some of it when you brush your teeth, some when you eat breakfast, and maybe not much when you go out. Whether it is recorded as a language or exists as a picture, the memory capacity at the level of human consciousness is limited, and the results of those conversations become more part of your behavior habits.
"Tony Waterfall" can be said a few words, as I feel, it is a very good movie, because it is clean and beautiful. Kind of reminds me of Wong Kar-wai and Hemingway at the same time. Taken out of context, it has a similar ethereal feel to Wong Kar-Wai's earlier films, but also Hemingway-esque simplicity. Tony is lonely, and Ichikawa Jun said, I just tell you that Tony is lonely. He didn't give us anything more, yeah, it's just a movie, and it's not for us to see a psychoeducational movie. Why tell us why Tony is lonely, aren't you alone?
It's really good-looking, Japanese directors are sometimes stubborn, and its panning cuts persist to the end, there is nothing good or bad, and even this kind of editing with a stage feel or the popularity of early films is just a choice. Just one. More importantly, less is more. The simplicity here isn't just about style, it gives the film more of a sense of space. Also, the prose-like rhythm is fascinating, and while it's subjective and far-fetched, it's really calming.
Real life is incomprehensible, and you can reason, because that's how you were taught. But in some details you will be caught by those sensory things, like slipping through the net. Every time I look back at myself, it's different. What's the difference, I can't tell. Just like what Tony heard from his father playing.

View more about Tony Takitani reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ayden 2022-04-20 09:02:37

    A highly abstract image style, however, this abstraction comes from daily life itself, mostly caused by the flatness caused by the telephoto lens, and the strict lateral shift of the lens from left to right. The image is dark and gray, it should be shot in HD. Not enough for Murakami.

  • Damion 2022-04-23 07:04:46

    Adapted from Haruki Murakami's short story "Tony Falls", but the interaction between the original and the film is rather dull. The film almost copied the text structure of the novel, and completed the paragraph transitions in the movement of the camera from the left side of the painting to the right of the painting, the director may want to build a kind of text with Haruki Murakami and the music of Sakamoto Ryuichi. Qi's image rhythm, but this overly neat, overly formatted division is somewhat incompatible with the village style. In a sense, perhaps the optimal solution is to not adopt the original linear structure of the novel in the text order of the film. All in all, this film belongs to the kind of film that "translates" words into films, rather than a film that truly "movieizes" words, which really opens up a dialogue across different artistic media. In addition, compared to the original, the additional ending added in this film is too redundant. It dispels the Raymond Carver-esque abrupt ending to a certain extent, but instead becomes more or less conventional. However, the remarkable thing is that Kazuki Ogata is too much like Murakami himself; the film also has polyphonic elements visually.

Tony Takitani quotes

  • Narrator: He found his home had been destroyed in the firebombing, and his parents and his only brother, lost to the same fate. In other words, he was then... utterly alone in the world.

  • Tony Takitani, Shozaburo Takitani: She was like a bird taking flight for a distant land...