This movie has done too many additions, or at least 8 points. Judging from the case itself, it is a very simple case, and even many people should be able to guess his modus operandi. If the case is the main line of this movie, there are only 2 progressions (or reversals) in the play, the first is the middle position, refuting the witness's affair with his wife, and the second is the ending, the new prosecution. However, most of the time in the play is to show the lawyer. However, I don't think the male protagonist is important here. If you change it to another lawyer, as long as the director believes that this is a wonderful murder case, the lawyer will not be able to find the flaw. In the play, the male protagonist's job-hopping, his wife, and the criminal's ball rolling machine have nothing to do with the case at all. This is an unnecessary addition.
Some film critics said that the film is a masterpiece, but only mentioned the advantages of the film without mentioning any shortcomings, and avoided the important to gain attention.
(Some people here misunderstood that the prosecution was for unplugging the wife's oxygen tube. In fact, the prosecution was for first-degree murder (successful murder). At the beginning, it was attempted murder, so it is different and can be prosecuted.)
PS: This shot is really amazing, the light and the dark are half and half, implying the inner struggle of the protagonist, I don’t know how to choose
View more about Fracture reviews
