Episodes 1 to 8 are illustration, shoes, stage, architecture, cars, portrait photography, text typography, and interior design. Frankly, the levels are uneven. Specific: The first episode is amazing, the stage design is the best, but there are limitations. The worst is portrait photography, the photographer is so hypocritical, I want to quit halfway through. The building I was most looking forward to was disappointing, and the architectural style I chose was unpleasant. It was very simple and boring. The architects are very good. There is no costume design.. Overall, the documentary has broadened my cognitive field, but it is difficult to carry the artistic thickness, because the selection is all contemporary designers rather than a typed summary, and I still have to read the book to understand the sense of area of interest. However, the designers' design beliefs and some pictures are really interesting. More importantly, as a documentary about the initial understanding of the Western contemporary design circle, it still plays a certain role in the display of the environment and life, but it is obviously lacking. sanded. The director still does not have an independent opinion of his own on the art of design, so this is where the error lies. Even putting aside the mistakes of the documentary itself as a communication medium, from the perspective of design concept and artistic belief, and looking back at the domestic works and creative atmosphere, I have to say that there is much room for improvement.
View more about Abstract: The Art of Design reviews
