Overall 6.5 out of 10
The music score is 9 points, which is quite suitable for the plot. The music at the beginning is very grand and mysterious. It makes people calm down and enter the plot. The soundtracks of several battles are well done, mainly for some quiet plots. The creation of the soundtrack is quite Excellent, the song before the final battle is also very good
The screen is 8 points, I originally wanted to give 7 points, the game cg is too heavy, the giant elephant siege is very good at the beginning, the first time after the launch of the holy sword ability is simply the unparalleled game of ps4, Jude Law is a replica of Warcraft, and the horn is giant. The magic cg game is too heavy, like watching Warcraft, Guy Ritchie's quick editing is really unfriendly to the audience
The plot is 6 points, I have the same problem as Super Bat, there are too many plots, hard fortress, although not blunt, but it is a bit confusing to watch, Super Bat is tired, this one is stupid, the character creation is a bit unsuccessful (actually not fail, only refers to Arthur)
I personally think it's a bit like a super bat
Hue, it creates a sense of grandeur in battle, the point of failure
King Arthur's whole film is a bit like Super Bat in shaping the characters. The protagonist is not well portrayed, but the highlights are all taken away by the supporting roles. The most eye-catching characters in this film are Jude Law's villain and witch, and Super Bat's highlights It's all the same for the heroine
Jude Law's hatred is inexplicable (I think it's just, in fact, the plot is very smooth), just because he was jealous of his brother's rights, he killed his wife, but Jude Law's acting skills have added points to this role, whether it's the sadness and despair of killing his wife and killing his daughter , I still treat Arthur arrogantly. The only failure is that it was said in the early stage that he had studied witchcraft, but the whole film is almost not shown, just lighting candles, performing special effects of fire eyes, and sacrificing living people when beating Arthur and beating his brother. Only when the ability can be turned on, but the plot also says that his ability becomes stronger when the tower is built. In fact, I feel that the tower has nothing to do with his ability at all.
Arthur's portrayal is too simple. He is a talkative prince, but he doesn't feel like a prince at all. Of course, a person who grew up in a brothel can be like a prince. The quick editing of , the eyes are very tired, the struggle is not enough, and the decisiveness is too segmental. In addition to being really handsome, I feel that this character is too single.
The mystery of the witch and the slightly evil feeling are well done. Compared with the role in the 4 addition, this one is much better, but the last character is so powerful and buggy, why didn't you use the ability in the first place? Just to make Arthur grow? And in the end, when the big snake attacked the city, how did Jude Law escape, I didn't see clearly.
The other characters and supporting roles are well portrayed, and the sacrificed teammates, father and son, and old loach are all very good.
This film is actually quite unfriendly to female audiences, so basically the reputation of female audiences should be very poor, there is no love story, and the heroine is also out of the routine of ordinary movies, not beautiful, nervous, and with the male lead There is no chemical reaction. There is nothing special about the hero saving the beauty. The whole film is almost all male protagonists. Although the female characters are all soy sauce, they are all amazingly beautiful. Except for Arthur and the villain, the male characters are not good-looking. Female audiences watch it. I don't think there is anything particularly handsome, nor does it sell rot or meat, and the accent of Beckham's character is really disgusting to me (just like seeing Yang Mi's original voice in the movie)
The worst point should be the editing. The biggest problem with this film is that the special effects are too game cg. If the fast editing is in an independent film, it will be better, but it is really not flattering in a commercial blockbuster. My friend watched it. He was confused, especially at the beginning when Arthur and the leader of the black armor said that he was blackmailing the Vikings. There were repeated quick edits, and several repeated names were strung up and down. I believe someone would see it clearly, but there are also People will feel weird
Since you want to invest in a movie with such a high capital, you should follow the most commercial steps to shoot it. There are too many plots. Although the plots such as Banshee in the Lake are actually not bluntly interspersed, audiences who have not understood the plot will I have doubts, the plot of the dark place is too interrupted, and it will be very tiring after fast editing. There are several monsters interspersed, but I don’t see much fighting, and Arthur is beaten into a pig’s head. The main battle scenes are too short, really It's good but not addicting, but fortunately, the battle finally regained a city. Why does the speed chicken, which is also a commercial film, look better and more popular with the public? One thing is that the special effects part is not short, and it is very enjoyable.
There are too few descriptions about Merlin. Brother Hunan is actually quite suitable for this role, but I don’t think the acting is particularly good and deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Moreover, the stories of the Middle Ages are not attractive in China, just like Journey to the United States is not acclimatized.
The dark wind was shot again (really, in recent years, the dark wind has become rotten and vomited), it is better to show the flesh honestly, sell and sell rot, and do more special effects, the box office of this film should be able to turn over Doubling it, although it will be scolded, it is still better than rushing all over the world now. The Chinese Dynasty is better than 100 million yuan. Really, the box office of this movie in the Chinese Dynasty is too pitiful.
The last thing I mentioned is the holy sword. I feel that the power of this sword is so explosive. Why didn't the king open Wushuang Qingbing at the beginning, let his soldiers die so many, and there was no scene to kill the wizard, but it showed that it was so powerful, and finally he was hanged by his younger brother. In the end, Arthur, who was half a bucket of water (anyway, felt that his sword was definitely not as long as his father's) actually killed Jude Law with a sword.
In fact, after watching this film, I really dare not boast, the flaws are quite obvious, but it is not so pitiful at the global box office. It is a pity not to see the second part, but it is a pity that the witch and Hunan brother cannot be seen.
View more about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
