I watched the sixth part of "Mission: Impossible" some time ago, and I felt uncomfortable, so I made up the first few parts easily (I only watched the first part before then).
The advantages of the Mission Impossible series are the suspenseful atmosphere, tactics, and the impossibility of challenges. Individuals are more interested in suspense. The current six personal rankings: 6>1≈4>3>5>2.
The following involves some spoilers
"Mission Impossible 1", the first part of the series, the quality is still relatively high
At the beginning of the story, the protagonists are assigned a task to "stop the traitor from stealing secrets." Then there was no accident, a large number of agents were killed and secrets were stolen. When the protagonist communicated with his boss, there was a reversal. This time the mission was to use bait to eliminate traitors, and the surviving protagonist was suspected. In order to get rid of the crime, the protagonist contacts the villain boss and exchanges secrets for the identity of the traitor.
This piece of tactics is still relatively good, such as the protagonist’s "Magic".
In "Mission Impossible 2", several face-changing tricks were used. But I feel something is wrong
As you can see in the third part, making facial masks and imitating sounds all require some steps to complete. In the end, the protagonist and the villain's deputy changed their faces and couldn't do those steps in a short time, which was a bit buggy. So personally think this one is worse.
"Mission Impossible 3", an inductive trick.
The black boss in the play especially likes to make things difficult for people. With the instinct of watching more movies, I feel that he is a good person. However, I was induced by the movie when I watched it.
When the white boss reported that "the protagonist caught the villain", the black boss frowned, and the victimized colleague said that "the black boss is the villain." So I changed my opinion and thought that the black boss was the villain. It wasn't until the white boss finally confessed the truth that he realized that he had been tricked. I have to say that this trick is really good.
Someone might ask why the black boss frowned and why he made things difficult for the protagonist. Personally, he guessed that because he had suspected that there was a traitor inside, he frowned when he asked the white boss if he knew it (in fact, the white boss didn’t know it). The black boss made things difficult for the protagonist because the white boss gave the wrong information to the black boss. Both the protagonist and the protagonist suspected the wrong person and misled the audience at the same time.
To talk about the shortcomings, it just doesn't make it clear what rabbit feet are. Some people say that this is the bait to purge the traitor. No matter what he is, the villain doesn't know what a rabbit's foot is, so why do you fiddle with this thing so desperately? Personally, it seems that the plot is not reasonable.
"Mission Impossible 4", this one has more laughs than the previous ones, "Eagle Eye" joins the team. The villain design is different from the previous ones
The first few villains designed relatively ordinary, the reason why the traitor betrayed the organization is basically for money, this is also a common routine in movies. However, because this kind of routine is so common, many movies now start to set the villain as an idealist with extreme ideology. For example, Thanos in "The Avengers".
In this movie, the villain is an extreme idealist. The reason why he wants to start a nuclear war is to create peace. It can be seen from the last jumping off the building holding the box that he would even give his life for this goal, not the kind of "false virgin" who is generous to others.
Some people may want to say, how can a nuclear war bring peace? In fact, this can refer to the United States dropping a nuclear bomb to Japan in World War II to accelerate Japan's surrender. Mankind’s fear of nuclear weapons will also make people even more afraid of war. Regarding this, we can also discuss the issue of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Of course, the protagonist's approach of "make a war if there is no war" is also very extreme, so he will become a villain. Just like Thanos, you don't have to go into it too deeply.
"Mission Impossible 5", many people think highly of Mission Impossible 5, but personally think it is average, because this villain is designed so strong that the protagonist can only open it.
When arranging the task at the beginning of the story, the syndicate directly arrested the protagonist, or the boss himself. During the interrogation, the heroine let him go, and the protagonist easily escaped from this organization. It was a bit of a joke. The syndicate was an organization that even the intelligence agencies of various countries infiltrated. Later, because the villain had infiltrated too much, and the high-level plan to dismantle the organization (the high-level still complained, "the success of the protagonist is too dependent on luck"), the protagonist is isolated and helpless and lacks helpers, and it seems that there is basically no chance of winning.
But in the end, the protagonist changed Director Attlee's face and used something like "Veritaserum" to force the British Prime Minister to follow his ideas. This is a bit too BUG. It can only be said that the villain's design is too strong, and the director can't edit it anymore, so he has to let the protagonist open up.
The advantage of this movie is that it describes more villains. The villain used to work for government departments. Because he helped the government kill too many innocent people, his ideals were shattered and his psychological distortion wanted revenge, so he became a villain.
Heroine: "You killed the innocent." Lien: "I killed more innocent people for the government." (Some people may ask why they kill innocent people. After playing "The Lurking Red Road", they will understand it, and I will add it later.)
"Mission Impossible 6", a series of calculations, almost full of high energy
The beginning of the story is a trick, using confined spaces to create information gaps and deceive the scientist, a bit like ever17. It was really amazing, and I was attracted to watch it. After that, many forces competed fiercely, one after another, and almost the whole process was high-energy. It is highly recommended to watch one.
The protagonist has been suspected of rebellion from the first part, and has been suspected until the sixth part. The first one was suspected because of money. The sixth part is suspected because he may go to extremes due to the disillusionment of his ideals (just like the villain boss in the fifth part). The protagonist said, do I have to be suspected of rebellion in the seventh?
View more about Mission: Impossible reviews
