The atmosphere in the first half of the film is well rendered, and the second half is all about logic. When I watched the first half, I was wondering if the heroine's daughter still exists. I am so curious, how should the script be played? In the end, my only thought was why should I waste more than an hour watching this logically dead movie? It was finally revealed that the heroine's husband didn't fall to his death, but was thrown downstairs for the purpose of hijacking the plane? ? ? I took a look, and the identity of the robber was something like an aerial patrol. The full text does not reveal whether the robber has this identity or not. Even if it is not, it has little to do with the development of the film. It is assumed that he has this identity.
The robber's plan was to find someone in a foreign country who knew the aircraft type, kill his important people, let the target return home with the coffin, and put explosives and detonating devices in the dead man's coffin beforehand, so that the target immediately The heroine chooses a flight with a robber and accomplice on the plane, stuns the heroine's daughter and hides it under the bomb to be detonated, so that more than 400 people on the plane have no image of the heroine's daughter at all, making the heroine's daughter. The illusion of non-existence, and the heroine who confirmed the existence of her daughter's various frantic demands to find her daughter will leave everyone with an unstable image of her, and the robber took the opportunity to tell the captain that the heroine was a robber and how much she wanted, Otherwise, the plane will be detonated, and after the robber's money has arrived, and the passengers and crew will get off the plane in order, he will shoot and kill the heroine as a person who takes care of the heroine, detonate the device, and frame the guilt for the heroine, making people think she is the heroine. Detonated, the robber shot and killed the heroine in order to stop it.
What kind of plan is this full of loopholes? How can I guarantee that the heroine will definitely buy the ticket for this flight, and also ensure that on the plane with more than 400 passengers, no one notices the child of the heroine, and the registration record also has no children. Information, how can the captain completely believe that a woman who is crazy to create a riot to find her daughter has suddenly turned into a robber. It is not what the heroine asked the captain in person, but the robber told the captain indirectly.
At the end of the film, after the plane landed, the heroine thought that she was acting as a disruptor and wanted to stay on the plane and wait for someone to hand over her, but someone would help her continue to find her daughter, but happened to see the captain preparing to leave the plane, The heroine wanted to explain to the captain again, and followed up with the captain who was about to get off the plane. After the captain said angrily that the heroine was a robber. When the real robber realized that he might be exposed, he fooled the captain and the hostess and was about to give up the original plan and get off the plane and run away. When the hostess realized something, the hostess asked her as a robber. The robber was to remain on the plane and the captain was asked to take the robber's gun away, but let all the crew continue to disembark. By the way, your heroine has confirmed that the captain is all right, and you still let the captain go. Do you think that you are a defenseless woman to deal with a man, and you have no problem looking for your daughter, right? Wouldn't you let the captain who confirmed his innocence stay, let other people who don't know black and white get off the plane, and continue to threaten the captain to subdue the robber as a robber?
It's really an unfinished film, or the story structure is to reflect the mother's love, and the heroine's personal heroism makes up a story of cause and effect.
View more about Flightplan reviews
