I was planning to start writing book reviews and movie ratings. After watching the movie, I felt that it was more interesting to talk about it. Compared to the movies adapted from Stephen King's novels (except The Shining), I think Ten Days of Dangerous Love is a relatively successful one. Kathy Bates is worthy of the name of the film queen, and the horror nurse Annie's crazy neuroticism is exquisitely portrayed, and every time Annie goes crazy, the angle chosen for the shooting is just right, making the viewers involuntarily fall into the horror of the hair standing up. . But compared to the novel, the portrayal of Annie in the movie version is not scary enough. Annie's sense of madness in the novel is very rich and layered, while in the movie it is relatively thin. The male lead's skills are also very good, and the eye scenes are very tense. I like the screenwriter's re-creation of the novel adaptation because the male protagonist in the novel has a lot of complex and profound psychological descriptions and dream descriptions, including the description of the novel written by the male protagonist in the novel. . It is true that these are not easy to film. The screenwriter replaced these contents with the outside world's search and rescue plot for the male protagonist, enriching the content of the movie from a small room to a town. Generally speaking, novels and movies have their own strengths and weaknesses, but novels give readers a more profound impression. Maybe this is the difference between the aesthetic experience brought by text and video art. My brain supplement is often more meaningful. By the way, the previous p1 shooting Wow, it feels like a classic sci-fi film, it can be said to be very feel
View more about Misery reviews
