As someone who has read the original work, I have to say that this multi-linear style, coupled with the chaotic timeline, is not as good as the original storytelling. The original stories have complete logic and thought-provoking philosophies. And the TV series is the endless black question mark. What I want to make the picture most is in the third part of the original book. In the blood of the elves, Xili is in a dream, recalling that when he fled from Sintra, the chaotic Sintra cavalry and the cavalry fell. And she was hugged by another cavalry. At that time, I was thinking about the interlacing of the camera with the night, the fire, and the desperate shouts of the cavalry: Turn, accelerate, fast! It must be wonderful. In the end, the direct narrative you put in the first episode of the first season I also endured it. . . I really took it.
And Ye Naifa's life experience, which could have been inferred by speculation and words, was directly photographed, which was dull and dull.
Regarding the first episode, whichever is the lesser of two evils, I personally think that the most exciting part of the original book. It turned out to be countless black question marks. It neither shows the contrast between the two evils, nor the entanglement in Geralt's heart.
Then the section of slaying the dragon was changed strangely. I totally lost the feeling of reading this paragraph of the original book. The character image collapsed in a mess.
I personally like the original work because of what it really expresses, its profound expressiveness and sense of picture, as well as the thinking between people and monsters. However, the first season of the TV series ended my fantasy in a magical way.
It's better to copy the original and tell the story patiently. . .
This is the premise that I have read the original, at least I know that it is telling the story in the original.
As a result, Beng’s inexplicable and mysterious changes.
A totally disappointed feeling.
View more about The Witcher reviews
