One day I watched a TV show about how to communicate with children. The speaker gave a picture, the mountains with mountains in the distance, the gentle flowing stream nearby, and the green trees swaying in the breeze on the shore. The speaker compared the painting environment to the family environment where children grow up. As a father, the male is masculine, the stream is likened to a mother, and the female is feminine. It is said that such a beautiful environment can breed excellent children. Although this explanation of the child's growth environment is a bit simple, it also shows a problem. Everyone has two sides in their personality. One side is tough like a mountain, and the other side is soft like water. The strength of guarding is the responsibility of being depended on; it also requires love and care and willful dependence, just like a woman's role as a husband, and a woman as a mother to a child; as a man is reliable before his wife, and childish before his mother. So both women and men have a two-way emotional connection, but women have more emotional appeals than men. For les, it may be difficult to really define the role of T or P, because both of them originally exist, no wonder Bette and Tina, the most pure and stable les partners in the first season of the l world, Bette will also be able to play because of the other A woman who touches her P complex cheats. The les map in the play shows that the relationship between les is often multi-directional and intricate. It seems that each one can find one or several layers of under-bed relationship. Leaving aside the erotic aspect, maybe it is Because each les will swing between the roles of T or P, this composite map is created. When choosing different roles, the objects of communication are also different, just like the roles in Marina's emotional appeal to Jenny and Francesca is different. I think there should be many such examples in the second, third and fourth seasons, so Les will have a more and more spread map, and the relationship between Les groups will be more chaotic, which is why I am reluctant to continue watching. I guess if this kind of role relationship falls on gay, it should have the same effect, but different genders should have different expressions. If you have the opportunity, you must watch a gay drama to verify it.
Let's talk about eroticism. In the real ethical society, gender is used to define the role relationship, T is a man and P is a woman. This role is given by society and is also called the social gender of human beings. The union of men and women is the only way for life to continue, which is called the natural law of life. I don't know if Darwin ever studied the case of same-sex mating evolution. But is it also a natural law that homosexual intercourse can reach a certain height? I remember a policeman in the first season summed up the relationship between les very classically: only two people of the same gender and with the same physical structure know how to make each other happy. Heterosexuals cannot reach that height, so they can get each other's love. It is here that the origin and continuation of the emotion between the lesbians lies. In the play, we can see the les rubbing against each other's ears, caressing and kissing, each other wantonly venting their desires on each other, and finally entering the climax of sensual enjoyment, the boundless world of eroticism. How many women are actually addicted to this erotic way, regardless of the role choice of T or P, or indulge first and then choose. Whether it is the intense sexual intercourse between women or the emotional TP dissociation, the ultimate result is les' self-lost, because nature has opened up a world of infinite desires to human beings, and it will inevitably add an inescapable punishment for infinite punishment. commandment.
Are you T or P? Where will desire go. . .
View more about The L Word reviews
