Great movie, goodbye syllogisms. The three protagonists meet in the final part. A brother-sister love, an extramarital affair, a father's love for his wife and daughter who betrayed his family. be witnesses to each other. Each of the protagonists' dogs is not a metaphor for themselves, but a metaphor for their intricate relationship, which is the director's brilliance. It's a shame that the movie has the typical Mexican vices of tedious procrastination.
However, the number of recent syllogistic films is too large to count: "Babel," "Crash," "Pulp Fiction," "The Elephant," "21 Grams," each of which uses a typical syllogistic structure, allowing People can't help but feel cliché. Of course, it would be unfair to say that about Amores perros, since it was filmed in 2000 before most syllogisms. Even so, comparisons are equally possible in syllogisms. Admittedly, several of the films are quite good and have their place in film history, just with different themes. Relatively speaking, I prefer "Tower of Babel" and "21 Grams", probably because the theme is more biased towards my preferences, one is the difference in human nature in cultural differences, and the other is redemption. Although the other films are all classics, they have their flaws more or less.
The convergence point of the syllogism chosen by "Amores perros" is one of the reasons why I don't think it can become a classic. Compared with the other few, there are few plot conflicts in the three paragraphs, just as a testimony. And the best one I think is "21 Grams". But when it comes to endings, Amores perros and Pulp Fiction are not inferior to Babel and 21 Grams, so Amores perros can be compared to these greats.
Overall, it's easy to understand, and the syllogism is very addictive. Although it is not as classic as it is, it is recommended.
View more about Love's a Bitch reviews
