When more people refer to Catherine's films, they are more about the scale of her films and the "real knives and guns" they were filmed, but they are more puzzled about what they want to express. , curiosity, disgust and ignorance. There are also many people who put the word feminism, which has been misunderstood, on the director's head. Feminism does not mean that women have exclusive rights. Feminists only demand equality between women's rights and men. , the difference is needless to say.
What the movie is "telling" us is what we can't see with our eyes, because our curious eyes are easily blinded by the pale skin of the heroine and the private things of the hero, and many people will be confused for the two The blending between them is "relish".
In fact, these are not uncommon things. Every boy will experience the same mood changes as the hero in the process of getting to know the girl's body. It's just that the boy's recognition process was delayed until he became an adult. When this "boy" knew the body of a woman he didn't know but should have known when he was young, his change was bigger than others. .
Every boy has a secret about the female body, whether it is masturbating by looking at the picture on the wall or touching the organ that other companions describe with contempt and secretly looking at it with longing eyes, whether it is to achieve peeping secretly The purpose is for the girl to take the initiative to lift her skirt. Any boy will be as uneasy as the male protagonist in the movie when he goes through all this, like the sea outside the house.
We had been told before that they were evil, so we despised them, just like the hero did after saving the woman, and that despise was not innate but also learned from the male companions; when we approached them, We are attracted to that evil again, and we want to prove that it exists, but in the end we are attracted to this evil, which is out of our control, because they are not "evil" themselves. If not every ethnic group has that kind of curse on female organs, it should be in the vast majority of ethnic groups. I remember when I was a child, the old man told us boys not to walk under women's underwear, because then It will bring bad luck; when we realize how ridiculous our previous contempt is and how obsessed we are with our new discoveries, we express our feelings in unreasonable ways. Some men are in their own "First night" crying, some calling Mommy when the climax came, some asking to get back together after the rush, didn't it all happen so easily? It is not difficult to understand the heroine crying like a child later.
A man can't get pregnant, so he has to possess all of a woman's possessions, and more than one.
This is the reaction of most boys when they become men, but some are not, they are either men in love, or they are gay.
In my opinion, comrades have not experienced the process of boys becoming men, so they will seek the protection of men and maintain the "contempt" of women in childhood. That's why I say the movie is describing the process of an adult "man" going from boy to man. The male protagonist is a man physically, but not psychologically. From when he used lipstick to paint the familiar non-genital female organs, and from his curiosity about the heroine's normal sexual organs, we can see that he is still a male protagonist. boy. Therefore, in the next few nights, he experienced the process of a boy becoming a man, but this process was a bit unbearable for him.
After the film is explained in this way, it is also complete, but it is still so visually impactful. What if we told the story another way? Like text? Get rid of it, then there will be less impact, many people will be drowsy in front of the screen or text, especially men, then they will not recall their original frizz and how they felt when they saw those female parts, then The director's purpose cannot be achieved.
It's just that the director forgot that when the impact is too strong, people's thinking is also ineffective.
Finally, on the purpose of the director, the director is a feminist, but she is a female egalitarian, not a female supremacist. So she's not trying to show something, knock something down, subvert something, she just wants to remind something. Reminder of what? Remind boys and men that women's stuff is not evil, women are not inherently despised, and women cannot be taken for granted because of these things and being abandoned by men.
That's all.
View more about Anatomy of Hell reviews
