I've been wanting to write something about Breakfast At Tiffanys for a long time, and seeing a lot of reviews from women's perspectives "please male audiences with thematic cues, and female audiences with fashion jewelry and romance", these words made me It feels cold and awkward, but what I seem to see behind the text is a way of thinking that is accustomed to the male-centered consciousness. In a huge and unfamiliar city, the beautiful and frightened courtesan and the writer who is also the Cowherd just meet by chance and take pity on each other. It seems that some men in life imagine that they can rescue and guide a young, beautiful, pure and kind but confused woman, and some women also imagine that they can use their kindness and tolerance to comfort a talented but suffering and poverty-stricken man. To be honest, this Great sense of accomplishment. Although my tone is somewhat ironic, I believe that beneath these "lights" is still the desire for love.
After being accustomed to deconstructing all the sublime, I was just able to gather the courage to speak softly about the old-fashioned word "love". Holly gained peace because of Paul's love and no longer lost and worshipped money. From then on, the prince and princess finally lived happily together, which seems to be the whole story. The other opinions I think of may just be my feelings. What I think of is that Paul's "saving" of Holly also saved himself, because this love gave him the courage to break with the past and face all difficulties. "Salvation" is also a word that is too serious to be believed or mentioned, and it seems to have a condescending and coercive connotation. In fact, two lonely people are connected only because of love. Because they have each other, they will not follow the crowd. They grow a root of fetters and entangle each other.
View more about
Breakfast at Tiffany's reviews
