I think, I understand what the director wants to express, I dare not say everything, but half, at least 51%, I understand. In fact, the opinions expressed by the director are all in the lines. All the actors' performances are only for the purpose of saying the lines in a timely manner and "speaking" the theme of the movie.
A woman, from a humiliated position, transfers humiliated feelings, feelings, to a man. She conquered a man with her unclean menstrual blood. Then the man felt the humiliation of a woman, so he fantasized about pushing her into the sea and killing her.
I saw someone here put this director and Duras together. I think the director and Duras have the same things, but they are all murmuring about some stories and some of their own opinions. This movie is very small, and it is good to publish it as a novel subject (it is adapted from a novel anyway). But as a film theme, it's too much: monotonous, dull, boring, slightly contrived, and acting for the sake of speaking. Fortunately, the movie is only one hour and fifteen minutes long.
There is also the point of view in the movie, which is not new in my opinion, but from the perspective of a woman, I said what a writer + a director said, and then made it into a movie. In fact, in order for the two sexes to gain a dominant position in this society, that is, to exist in the so-called male/feminist society, they must not conquer the other sex, let the other sex submit to their own sex, and let this process continue for a long time. That's it. To promote feminism, it is nothing more than that. Some things that men put on women are in turn put on men. I think this play has some similarities with "Romance". While watching it, I always think of the heroine in "Romance" lying on the examination chair in the hospital, when a group of medical boys observe her private parts. Proud look. Is this how women look for their own value to reflect their self-esteem? It's just a product of male domination. Anyway, the boundaries between men's rights and women's rights are sometimes blurred, and this is not the point of view I want to discuss.
BTW, the male and female protagonists in this director's play seem to be similar. (I've only seen Romance and this one.) It
was written on the spur of the moment , and it's written in a chaotic manner.
View more about Anatomy of Hell reviews
