A buddy in the dormitory once said that he and his girlfriend once went out to press on the road, and when they returned to school, they had an argument with someone on the 14th road. The buddy came up to hit him in the face, and he even slapped blood in his eyes. Later, he accompanied him to Nanchang. A small clinic on the other side of the street looked at it, but fortunately nothing happened. At that time, I asked him, how can you hit people in the face when you come up, what should you do if you make a bad appearance or kill him. As a result, he said, I would rather kill others and kill me than I can be killed by others...
Now that I read "The History of Violence", the first thing that comes to my mind is this old thing, because the hero Joey is a The master of slapping people only in the face, and found that slapping the face is indeed the magic weapon for winning fights. If I have no experience, I must observe and learn more.
In fact, the name "History of Violence" is very big, but it only tells the story of a family. The film process does not seem to be very violent, but looks unusually calm. The movie is not bad, it is the kind of clean and neat type that I like, there is no trace of patchwork in the whole movie, and every scene and every plot is not redundant.
After reading it, I am thinking about whether violence is acquired or innate, as if the proto-oncogene needs to be activated. It seems that the director prefers the latter. And it seems that violence always produces violence in the movie, and violence is solved through violence. After watching, there is still a market for violence to control violence, and it is also the king's way...
In addition, "Aragon" looks so old in fashion, and in the movie The second sex scene of the episode is good and just right.
View more about A History of Violence reviews
