I saw a lot of people saying that this film should be 5 points, 4 points. It's a very good movie. Yes, in terms of special effects and sensationalism, this movie does basically achieve full marks. But what I want to say is that a movie really can be a good movie only by special effects and sensationalism. At least not in my opinion. No matter what movie it is, first of all, your story must be complete and logical as much as possible, otherwise no matter how good the special effects are, it will be a castle in the sky. If any petroleum worker can go to space to save the earth and say that it is okay to be praised by people, then why are people scolding for tearing devils and hiding thunder in their crotch? I think the possibility of the latter is easier than drilling a hole in space, right? So what is the difference between those who praise the movie and say that as long as the special effects can ignore the loopholes in the plot, what is the difference between those who will only desperately black the loopholes and ignore the wonderful drawing of the special effects?
I have always believed that a movie that does not evaluate all aspects and only comment on the good or the bad is an act of hooliganism. Peerless Heavenly Tribulation is a good movie in terms of special effects and drawing, but it has too many loopholes in terms of story and logic. In particular, he starred in a sentence that this book said. He said that he also asked Mike Beatty back then After this question... the director's answer is, you shut the fxxx up...
So I personally think this is a good popcorn movie, it is worth watching, but it is a pity that there are one or two small stones in the popcorn from time to time, which makes people uncomfortable to eat. 3 points
View more about Armageddon reviews
