The original work that had passed the purpose in advance gave me no room for recollection after making me interested for a while, and I was labelled as a clever police novel with history and religion. Of course, such a crude and uninteresting characterization is only from the perspective of a materialist. As a religious outsider, it is difficult for me to connect this novel closely with the value system I follow. Therefore, I cannot understand the actual meaning of the fights between the characters and between sects and sects. Abandoning the inner thinking and entanglement, the only joy I experience from it is to follow the outline of the author's Dan Brown narrative to gradually figure out who is the good and the bad. However, on the other hand, the superficial resume also gave me a suitable fulcrum to dismiss the author's gorgeous tricks coldly.
I heard that it was going to be made into a movie a long time ago, but as soon as the cast was announced, I felt that the choice of the two main protagonists of the man and the woman was too far-fetched: Tom Hanks had already exposed his acting skills in the previous the Terminal and the Ladykillers. The obvious degradation of Audrey makes people wonder if he should go back to farm; and Audrey Tautou seems to have been framed to death by Amelie’s role in people’s impressions, even in serious movies like A Very Long Engagement, she is still With an Amelie-like smirk on her face, we don't want a Sophie who is silly while running for her mouth to appear on the screen. I even firmly believe that such a combination is just to completely correspond to the surface objective factors such as the nationality, age, and background of the characters in the book, thus erecting the giant sign of "the combination of American, British, and French international players": Robert Langdon's The identity is a Harvard professor, a good person who has no suspense, so he picked Tom Hanks, a classic model of personal heroism among middle-aged male film stars in the United States; Sophie Neveu is a young French girl, and now France Apart from Audrey Tautou, who is the most famous of the new generation of actresses? In fact, just for the role of Sophie, it might be better to choose an American actress who is both rigid and soft. It is like letting Zhang Ziyi play the Japanese. In today’s heyday of fake dramas, Why is it necessary to sacrifice the character's portrayal space for this literal harmony and resounding? Therefore, compared to the weakening of the horror and suspense in the book by the script of the film that will be mentioned later, the director's effort to be faithful to the original is obviously wrong. But I actually went to the cinema a few days ago, and under the bombardment of light and sound, I don’t think how bad they are. At least how can the actors behave against such a movie where the story is the key to success or failure. Ignore it. I admire the matching ability of this large group of people.
It is easy to transfer the responsibility of the role failure to the script, then the failed script that we are about to talk about will have nowhere to settle. First of all, we have to clarify a question, that is, who is this movie filmed for, is it someone who has read the original or someone who hasn’t read the original? (Of course, film dealers certainly hope that the dead can crawl out of the soil to buy movie tickets.) This is related to what criteria we should use to consider this type of film adapted from a best-selling book. I once had such an experience. I went to the cinema to watch "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban" with a friend. After watching it, he said that this was the best shot among the first three films. My opinion was just the opposite, because I did not understand. The difference between us is that he has read novels before and I haven't read any of them. If this issue can still cause disputes between the two types of viewers of "Ha", then when it is moved to "The Da Vinci Code", it is destined to not cause controversy. "Da" is completely defeated. . Many people who have never read the book said that they can’t read movies. The buddies who went with me in my dormitory prepared 100,000 whys for me after they walked out of the theater. This is not just a context caused by ignorance of religion. Deviation, because recalling the plot and context of the movie, there are indeed a lot of inadequate explanations. The most impressive thing is that the narrative of Saunière’s actions in the underground ceremony of the monastery passed in a flash, and the audience even simply It was hard to notice that the person wrapped in the blanket was Saunière himself. So can it justify itself that this is a film tailored for the readers of "Da"? There are no doors. Because in this way it becomes a bowl of boiled water. The work it has done in these two and a half hours is to constantly use the simplest means to fulfill the plot that the viewers are so familiar with. There is almost no suspense at all, just like the kindergarten aunt is saying, "Children, I will tell you one. The story of the Da Vinci Code", you can imagine the situation afterwards. In the original work, several places that could have created tension and fuel the development of the narrative were deleted and modified, including Langdon and Sophie who fled the Louvre Palace through the search of the patrol guards in the museum after they led away the Fazi team. And the next choice of the Swiss bank's opening code, etc.; at the beginning of Teabing's house, the butler's several appearances were sneaky, and this premature suggestion also weakened the tension of the plot; the original book One of the biggest traps set is that the true identity of Sir Teabing was poured out in the film in such a straightforward manner, and before I watched the film, I wanted to see what the film will be in a quiet manner. Hid him till the end, I was completely disappointed. But after Teabing was arrested and brought to justice, the pace was suddenly dragged down almost to the point of being brought to life.
So there is no excuse for the failure of this movie. Let the scolding be stronger!
http://publish.sina.com.cn/poll.php?p_id=45&t_id=2199
View more about The Da Vinci Code reviews