And the film I don’t think he has the feeling of going against the original. The film is just very responsible for fulfilling the role of commercial film taking care of the understanding of most audiences. Or in other words, the depth of the
As the novel itself, when I first saw it, I really felt it was quite deep, because there are not many people in the East who have a deep understanding of Western religion and art, at least I don’t understand it. So the novel Even though the author has spent a lot of thought, it is mainly curious elements for many readers. Of course, it has brought many people to the history and data exploration, and learned about the religious rituals, allusions, works of art and The names of people are true. As for Catholics, if they understand that Jesus is a man or not a god, will they really believe in collapse? If this is the basis of the entire Catholic Church, then this sect is not worth maintaining. And the film is not for fairness. For the sake of putting the facts aside, at the end it added a plot that was not in the book. Langdon asked Sophie whether you, as a descendant of Ye Ye, would inherit this religious belief or betray it. Then he talked about his own experience, yeah Su exists as a kind of spiritual meaning, and only this is the foundation for the continuation of various religious beliefs. Just like the Buddhism we believe in, whether Sakyamuli really became a Buddha under the Bodhi tree, and what is the definition of becoming a Buddha All Westerners cannot understand. But from the very beginning, we affirmed that he changed from a human, and then the meaning of Buddhism lies in perception, not in idolatry itself.
View more about The Da Vinci Code reviews
