Before I was recommended by others, I had high expectations for this movie. After all, Mr. Hopkins's image of Hannibal was too classic, and in this movie he once again played the role of high IQ criminals, so it's hard not to look forward to this movie. When I watched the movie, I was excited. After all, I haven't seen such a wonderful criminal image on the screen for a long time. I even wanted to give a rating of 4 stars or more, but after calming down, I found that in the core part of the film ( Or the core part I think), the film didn't do what I wanted.
The film uses a lot of contrasting techniques. By comparing the positions and attitudes of ryan gosling and anthony hopkins before and after the incident, there is a lot of room for the actors to perform. The comparison between the subject films, let's talk about the shortcomings of this film.
A few years ago, there was a "Disappearing Lover" that achieved a good reputation among the audience. In terms of the general structure of the story and the way of narration, the two are similar. They both let the audience start from the perspective of God and first understand the whole story of the case. , in explaining and reflecting some problems by stripping the cocoon. However, in terms of the theme of the film, the two are fundamentally different. Through the story told in the film, "Gone Lover" deeply reflects a pathological relationship between the two sexes that begins with a marriage relationship, and can even Let people read the taste of two points of egalitarianism, but this film explores the rationality of common law principles such as the "poisonous tree fruit theory" and "prohibition of double danger" in terms of jurisprudence. The taste of Angry Man, as far as I am concerned, this kind of film related to the discussion of jurisprudence is very appetizing to me, but this film gives the impression that it only mentions these two concepts, from the story There is no sign of further investigation in the structure, and there are great gaps and deficiencies in the depth of the plot, which makes me very disappointed.
In addition to the depth of the plot, the plot itself also makes me feel very abrupt. In the early and middle stages of the film, the director's control of the narrative rhythm can be said to be perfect, but in the ending part, it makes people feel inexplicable. Turning and conflict, the rationality built up by the characters in more than an hour is a little bit worn away, so that the characters are finally symbolized and flattened. In the end, the audience feels that the director is not only showing off his storytelling skills. , and did not seriously sculpt the story itself, thus making the quality of the film unable to go to a higher level.
Finally, the acting skills of ryan gosling and anthony hopkins in this film, especially the latter, still portray this high-IQ criminal vividly, leaving no room for criticism. As for the former, because this film is its early work, it is slightly It is normal to be young, but compared to the same age group, it is already very good. If the audience wants to see his more skilled and excellent interpretation works, "La La Land" is a good choice.
In a word, this film can be said to be barely passable in terms of plot, and the starring of ryan gosling and anthony hopkins has prevented the film's reputation from falling off a cliff. If you have a little spare time, compared to other junk films, this film also Still worth seeing.
View more about Fracture reviews
