When Tony Stark's glasses were in Peter Parker's hands, I felt bad.
When the note was unfolded and the letter was written [To the next Iron Man], this unpleasant feeling came true.
Spiderman is an independent character.
Spiderman does not need to be the next Iron Man.
Spiderman, shouldn't be the next Iron Man.
In "Spider-Man: Far From Home", after the key line [To the Next Iron Man] appeared, the intention became "Peter Parker: Godfather's Biography".
Uncle Ben’s famous line of "the greater the power, the greater the responsibility", while serving as the foundation of Spider-Man, was shot over and over by different works. Although many people may be tired of watching it, this does not mean Marvel and The screenwriter can transfer Uncle Ben’s plot to Tony Stark. I can't control what others are doing, and I can't accept this kind of embezzlement myself. Damn thief.
Of course, I understand that for a series of superhero movies, the hero must grow. However, I don't understand why the idea of "Spider-Man: Far From Home" is tied to [To the Next Iron Man]. After watching this movie, I didn't understand why Spider-Man was so cringe and afraid to take the burden of Iron Man, nor did I understand why Spider-Man took the burden of Iron Man.
①Why is Spider-Man so cringe and afraid to take the burden of Iron Man?
I wonder if Peter Parker is 16 years old, but in "Spider-Man: Homecoming", he is already a hero who can stand alone (although there is still a fucking Tony Marvel away, I can't make a movie Stark ), Then Spider-Man also participated in the Final Battle of Avengers 4, and his strength and character stood up. As a result, as soon as Tony Stark retired, Peter Parker's characterization and psychological age instantly returned to the early days of "Spider-Man: Homecoming".
The last one that became like this was Thor from Thor 3 to Fulian 3. In Ray 3, he realized that the hammer of Mull'Nir was only a weapon. The true power of a god comes from himself, not from anything outside. . But in Avengers League 3, in order to win Thanos, what Thor did was to find new awesome weapons-seeing this, I have scolded Brother Russell 1,000 times in my heart.
This comparison makes it obvious that Marvel's Spider-Man cannot dance independently without Tony Stark. Marvel doesn't know how to make a movie without Tony Stark, so "Spider-Man: Homecoming" must be Filmed with Iron Man, and found a godfather for Peter Parker; and "Spider-Man: Far From Home" was not spared, and continued to film with Iron Man, and set the intention to [For the next Iron Man], and Spider-Man My image must go back to "Spider-Man: Homecoming" for this, even if he is already an independent hero, he must be Tony Stark's godson.
What a fucking shit.
②Why is Spider-Man taking the burden of Iron Man?
I am thinking about the Avengers. Although the deaths were scattered after the end of the fourth episode, it was not without people. The result was good. A large group of people gave the leadership position to 16-year-old teenagers. It’s not that it’s impossible, but I just wondered. For Tony Stark, he must know that Spider-Man has his own way. Even if you give the glasses to Peter Parker, the message should not be [Give the next steel Xia], but [for the only Peter Parker]. This seems very funny. Tony Stark believes that Peter Parker, a 16-year-old teenager, can surpass his knowledge and experience to become the leader of the reunion, but he does not trust his Spider-Man identity, but wants him to be the next Iron Man. This kind of line shouldn't be what Tony Stark would say, and [To the Next Iron Man] definitely shouldn't be the idea of a Spider-Man movie.
There are many movies with the idea of surpassing the father, but for the Spider-Man movie with the idea of surpassing the godfather, I suggest Marvel eat some shit to calm down.
As for the plots of calling Iron Man’s colleague Hapi to pick him up, rushing to London by Iron Man’s plane, using Iron Man’s equipment to make Spider-Man suits, etc., I see that there is no strength to continue to complain. The rich second-generation godson is awesome, I got it.
In fact, I want to talk about the places where movies are made well, there are indeed some. I am personally satisfied with the AR part of Spider-Man First War. Spider-Man is trapped in the Snow Globe in New York, and the Snow Globe becomes the helmet of the mystery. This part is my most satisfying scene in the whole film. As the villain, the background setting of the mystery guest is very interesting, but obviously the screenwriter does not want to dig deeper into this character, so the mystery guest exposed his true face after enduring the success. The filming is really fucking without imagination. , It's so boring, poor Gyllenhaal took such a shit role, it was a waste of his acting skills, I was heartbroken, and I felt it was not worth it. It's not worth it! !
I have to say that the setting of the mysterious guest is quite real in the world. He has worked so hard to research such an awesome virtual reality technology, and the results all belong to Tony Stark himself. Tony Stark also developed the conference. He also changed the name of the mystery guest’s technology to [Er Chuang], and finally even After expelling the Mystery, the patent is clearly owned by Stark Industries-Mystery, you are really miserable. The confrontation between the small employees and the capitalists, and the confrontation with the godsons of the capitalists, is so real, alas.
In fact, if the last group of Tony’s employees can really successfully fight against the big capitalists, it will look much better to me than "Godfather's Biography" and have a higher intention, but the protagonist of "Godfather's Biography" is not a group of people who have mastered technical knowledge after all. Ordinary people, but the godsons of the rich second generation. Poor and sigh.
That's it for the idea of the movie. In addition, there are some fragmentary thoughts, please write it down here:
1. What happened in London and the Avengers didn’t respond, I don’t even bother to complain.
2. Director Joe Watts has a poor grasp of Spider-Man's movements. All the swing shots are poorly done, and there is no sense of power. The timing of the first-person lens insertion is also very poor, and it does not increase the sense of presence but destroys the overall sense of the action scene.
3. All the action and play are completely Marvel’s consistent assembly line style and quality. The cutting is too fast, broken and chaotic, without a sense of power or speed, bad action design, poor lens connection, and I feel Marvel’s fight For audiences who are doing well, I sincerely recommend watching more different movies, don't watch this Marvel shit, especially don't feel special effects in Marvel shit.
4. I don’t know if it’s the director’s poor level or what’s wrong. There were many unnatural lens connections throughout the film. For example: Harpy and MJ’s shot in the vault, MJ wanted to use the iron hammer, Harpy wanted to stop it. she. However, the camera here did not capture the positional relationship between the two people. It just shot back and forth, which made it unclear how the two people stood in the vault. There are many places like this in the whole film, but I don't have the energy to record them one by one.
5. MJ is really cute! ! I liked her very much the first one. I will watch the third part for MJ. Yes, I will watch the third part for MJ.
6. Marvel eats shit.
View more about Spider-Man: Far from Home reviews
