I was frantically complaining and full of question marks throughout the whole process. I couldn't believe that I was a fan of the second brush bug 1, crying because of the dust!
At the beginning, even at the end, it was enveloped in an atmosphere of "Yes, but not necessary." Compared with 1’s compactness and coherence, 2 is like a long campus journal. The character's mood turns blunt. It’s not so much the growth and awakening of a superhero, it’s a series of remedies after being stupid, and finally being splashed with dirty water...The whole film is the highlight moment from the tulip field to the stop of the drone. It’s worth watching. .
Does such a long-lasting IP of Worm need to be so dependent on the heat of others? Does it need to be emphasized repeatedly in order to appear very explosive? Salute is a good thing, but it's really good to stop in moderation.
Also, although the bug is a minor, he has shown good psychological control ability in his previous appearances. He will make mistakes, but he can also wake up and remedy in time. Under the mound, he will continue to cheer himself up and stand up again. In the omitted part of this series, he was able to become Spider-Man. Isn't that an example of his passing the psychological barrier?
Moreover, the villain’s handling of it feels one size fits all...The first part can also feel that "the hateful person must be pitiful". This time the villain is almost reversed for the sake of the villain...
Watching Avengers 3 and 4, I feel that many of the plots are in OOC... I didn't expect Spider-Man also...
View more about Spider-Man: Far from Home reviews
