Most of the film’s comments focus on the discussion of the rule of law or violence against violence, but in fact, who is the biggest black hand in the border killer and the most hidden boss? Colombian drug lord? The CIA just feels that Mexican drug lord is not on the road, and is willing to pave the way for Colombian drug lord?
Of course, the CIA is not a living Lei Feng, but a part of the chain of drug trafficking interests. In the beginning, in order to raise secret funds to carry out secret operations in Central and South America and the whole world, the CIA was granted certain privileges to obtain funds from drug lords. It might have been just a stopgap measure, but some "patriots" felt that they had to leave it alone. The congressional elbow should do something practical to fight against the anti-American forces. But once this case is opened, once a strong vested interest group is formed, it will be difficult to put the devil back into the bottle.
The film is good because it is hidden. The heroine goes deep step by step. The CIA also gives plausible answers again and again, like squeezing toothpaste, but we can be sure of the final answer: the drug trade cannot be banned. So it's better to foster a drug lord who obediently keeps order and does not kill people. Is it true? Even if it is true, when an organization, or a key figure in the organization, has the power to win over the tens of billions of drug trades, can it still be restrained from not sharing a piece of the pie?
Therefore, the institutions used to protect the people of the country have their own vested interests in the end, and they have become the bane of poisoning the people of the country. Therefore, the United States will never end its anti-terrorism efforts, and the anti-drug prohibition will never be clean, so why? Because this is most in the interests of the power sector.
Therefore, the disillusionment of the heroine is not just a heart attack, but procedural justice is everywhere. In the middle of the movie, the heroine also partnered with the black partner Amway: This is the real fight against drug dealers. What we did before was just playing.
However, it turns out that the ultimate goal is not drug control, but business competition. It just so happens that Mexican drug lords kill too many people and give the United States a reasonable excuse to intervene.
However, there are some unreasonable points in this film. Assault tunnels and send killers into Mexico. There should be no need for causality, right? Is it a piece of cake for the United States to send individuals to Mexico? The assault tunnel is so big, wouldn't it increase the alertness of the boss? I originally thought that the assault tunnel was to lure snakes out of the cave or something. And why did the heroine draw her gun immediately after seeing the killer? It's a bit nonsense. Since they all participated in the operation assault on the tunnel, when the killer caught a drug transporting policeman, he turned his face and aimed the gun at his companion? The motivation is a bit vague.
The best thing about this film is that the gun battle is clean and tidy. The hand speed of the killer is really fast. Anyone who has ever shot a real pistol knows that it is very difficult to overcome the recoil and aim at the next target after firing a shot. The killer kills three times in a row in less than one second, it is really a god. also.
View more about Sicario reviews
