The themes of the three films "Life and Death", "Split", and "Mr. Glass" are good. At first I felt that they were the appearance of realistic comic heroes. But after reading all of them, I personally feel that this is more like a multiple choice question about fate. Glass has been choosing to find the truth all his life, looking for those who always have "superpowers", even if this persistence is called "devil". Du has always chosen his so-called righteous identity after he became a "hero" from being ignorant at the beginning to being inspired by glass. Kevin is the most pitiful. He is surrounded by twenty-four personalities. Some want to protect him, some want to occupy him. He can only choose to hide in the dark. Even if he turns into a beast in the end, it is not his choice. If Glass hadn't chosen to find the truth, Kevin and Du would not have appeared, and if Glass hadn't insisted on his choice, in the end, it would be impossible for people to know that the truth he had been looking for was right, thus having the final scene. Everyone is doing multiple-choice questions all their lives. This is a lousy word, but it is true. Can everyone always insist on their own choices? Do you still choose this when everyone is questioned? Although Shyamalan's trilogy is not very good, I think it's a good idea. And it feels like there is a sequel.
View more about Glass reviews
