I'm a passerby fan, and I don't have a deep fan. I thought that Ragnarok should be a tragic epic with Wolverine 3 before watching the title. Before that, I had a good impression of Thor 1-2, plus The addition of Cate Blanchett made me look forward to it even more. On the day of the show, I went to see Thor 3.
The entertainment effect was really good, and it made me laugh, but after the laugh, I carefully reviewed the plot of the next film: Thor and Loki went to the earth to find their father, and his father explained that Hela was about to return and died. Hela arrived and squeezed Thor's hammer and beat the two brothers to Sakar, and then slaughtered Asgard. The Thor brothers went on a happy journey in Sakar and found the Hulk and the Valkyrie at the same time, and released them after returning to Asgard. The flame giant makes the gods twilight, and everything is over.
First of all, I personally feel that why Odin died so plainly, neither moved nor meaningless. I previously guessed that Odin might not survive, but the death of Odin I expected was to protect Asgard. As for the war dead, the processing in the film is really ordinary. Secondly, the titular Twilight of the Gods, most of the length is Thor and Loki’s happy journey with the Hulk and Valkyrie on another planet, and it does not reflect the urgency and urgency for Asgard, who is under the control of Hela. On the heart, it leads to a very intuitive feeling: selling dog meat at the expense of sheep's head.
Then, regarding the setting of the flame giant, I was also a little bit confused. At the beginning, I saw the flame giant saying that he was the twilight of the gods, but it was given the second by Thor. Then there was no line in the film mentioning the flame giant, and there was no introduction. His situation or ability, until the end, he came out to destroy Asgard, giving me a very dark feeling. I had always naively thought that Ragnarok was Hela, but I didn’t expect that she was the only one who did not give up Asgar. People of Germany, Hela will die as light as a feather in the end... Anyway, he was also from the group of soldiers of the fairy palace and the Valkyrie...
Let’s talk about the personality problem. Many people have analyzed that Loki’s personality can’t be connected to the previous game, and in Avengers 3 it seems that Loki is on the same line with Thanos. It feels very bad... I mainly say that I am against Thor, the protagonist. There is also a sense of collapse in the feeling of human design. Because of the many elements of this comedy, Thor's intuitive feeling for me is very funny. However, when Hella found out that he was not an opponent in the battle, he released the flame giant to destroy Hella and his homeland and country. Although there is a line: Where there are people, there is Asgard. But according to the announcement of Avengers League 3, did the people of Asgard be rescued for the purpose of destroying the tyrants? So what is the meaning of this sentence? Doesn't this completely portray Thor as a superhero who is nothing but comedy? The homes were not well protected, and the people died tragically under Thanos. It is really more valuable to let the people die in defending their homes.
I heard that the original version of the script did not have a comedy element. It was rated as "Marvel's best" after adding the comedy element. This may also have cultural differences, but the direct feeling for many passers-by is that Marvel movies = comedy movies. The three Marvel movies in 2017: "Guardians of the Galaxy 2", "Spider-Man: Homecoming", and "Thor 3: Ragnarok" have all become comedies. The first two can be understood even if they are comedies, but the gods Evening is such a good subject, if you make good use of it, it might become a classic, but it looks a bit nondescript now. In order to pave the way for Fulian 3, many things worth digging were destroyed (someone said before that the civil war also gave people a feeling of being photographed as infighting). It's not that telling a story a little more serious is boring. Does one film have to add so many comedic elements? Wouldn't it be better to add some thought-provoking things to a film (Marvel's X-Men makes good use of this)?
Finally, I would like to clarify my position: I don’t ask for how epic, how heroic, and tragic, but please tell a story with your heart, and don’t make the feeling of selling dog meat.
View more about Thor: Ragnarok reviews
