It is easy for people to have a misunderstanding, thinking that people in economically backward places will not value love even more, and this is explained by Maslow's demand model. This is actually wrong. Love should be the lowest and core demand of human beings. People in economically backward areas also understand love, and their cherishment of love will never be less than that of people with good economy. But the difference is that because of cultural issues, they lack more ways to express their importance to love. Their most common way to express their importance to love is to associate it with "death", "love when you die", which is very straightforward. Love even after death, what can express this love than this is so important to me?
Please forgive me for substituting economic backwardness for cultural backwardness, because the two are closely related, and I will replace it with "culture" as the topic of discussion below. More educated people will use various cultural methods to make "love" more hierarchical, and gradually reflect the weight of love in the hierarchical process. They have a variety of euphemistic songs, non-straightforward poems, and profound words to express love. Sometimes he says that the way to love you is to talk about the weather or some unrelated topics. There is something unusual in the discussion. It requires the expression of your taste; sometimes it is not expressed at all, but some behavior details are revealed, and if the other party can taste this deep love, it can be deeply intoxicated. The culturally laggards have no less need for love, but apart from saying "love even after death", it is difficult to find other ways to express the very sincere and urgent love in their hearts. The embarrassment is that when you get along with two kinds of people, you may not be able to accept your expressions so bluntly. How much love is there when you die? Or the love buried in the details of the other party, you can't accept it. What the hell is "the moonlight is beautiful tonight"? You feel that the other person is boring, or you feel that the other person does not love you.
The difference between these two kinds of people is actually the difference between "Wolf Warriors 2" and "Dunkirk".
"Wolf Warriors 2" is also refreshing. The protagonist is skillful and patriotic, winning the love of beautiful women and taking revenge. . . The "patriotism" shown in the whole movie is very straightforward. If it is not said from the protagonist's mouth, then I would like to be accompanied by a barrage, capitalized: "I am very patriotic! I want to defend the motherland!!!" "Dun" is restrained and tolerant a lot. Savour some details, you will feel more touching. The son of the civil ship master repeatedly hinted that he would turn around and go back, "You turned on the engine too fast, and it’s about to burn!" "Your companions are injured, why don't we go back?" "He didn't drive the parachute, he didn't drive it! (suggestion) The soldier on the plane may be dead, so you don’t need to save it)! "The civil ship master always responds briefly, and he doesn’t talk about big truths. On the contrary, he talks about minor truths, but you can feel his determination with these little truths. "We have all driven so far (it is not appropriate to go back)" "I hear you I hear you! He didn't drive the parachute but he may not die, maybe." He didn't say such things—"We want to save him, these Soldiers defend our motherland, now is our time to protect them." British gentlemen disdain to express their patriotism in this way. The pilot knew that he had run out of fuel, and insisted on shooting down the last plane, and finally forced to land on the enemy's position. Before being captured, he methodically burned the plane so as not to fall into the enemy's hands. When captured, he was still calm. The master of civil ship was very calm. The ground commanded the boat to escape the enemy’s air attack, and even the destroyer could not hide; another pilot almost died in the fierce battle, and was rescued and returned to the UK. Those who don’t know the truth ridiculed him “where were your air forces in the battle”, he didn’t. To justify: these calm and unobtrusive behaviors are actually very fascinating. Patriotism is a kind of feeling, and it is a function to help the motherland. The value pursuit of gentlemen is to really help the motherland solve some problems, not All the crowds will add to the chaos. So rational, they still regard death as home. Does this attitude make their love appear deeper? When soldiers were driven into embarrassment by the enemy, the first thing they thought was that they felt guilty for escaping back to the motherland. Isn't this love for the motherland? The people of the motherland embraced their return very very enthusiastically. Isn't this a kind of love? Unless it is necessary, love does not need to be proclaimed, but hidden in the details, so that people who know it can taste the weight, and the cohesiveness of this weight seems to be more durable.
PS. The topic is just a gimmick, a gimmick, nothing more. Ha ha.
View more about Dunkirk reviews
