I watched it at a local cinema on the morning of September 30, because it was not a weekend but also during the day. There were not many people, but there was a lot of laughter. Because I’m too familiar with the original, and all the trailers have been edited many times, it doesn’t seem to have too many "surprises", because it is really faithful to the original. Even the wife sitting next to me still watched it half a year ago. After my first translation, I often smile with my heart because the lines are copied from the book. In the trailer, there is a clip of Watney touching the screen with a pair of mother and son... At that time, I was discussing with the editor whether the original work was changed so that he has a wife and children. I guessed it was an editing method. , Cut the clip of another astronaut talking with his family to Watney's side... My estimate was correct (this is not a spoiler). In addition, there is a trailer in which Rich told several NASA big guys about his Hermes maneuver plan, which was also cut directly from the feature film. You can check it out, which is especially fun. The actor Richie is second only to Watney in the whole movie. My favorite is even more funny than Watney. The image of the fanatical but somewhat obscure engineer in the original book is very active, and it is also rare in the movie. Some characters are designed to expand the character of the original characters. Another character that surprises me is a head of Chinese surname Wu of JPL. This person is a bit harder in the original book. He was forced to build spacecraft by bosses, and he was a little serious, but in the movie. But he was an innocent, flexible man who worked overtime until he was in pajamas and had a teleconference. His trembling baggage is also good. The movie, like the original, has three lines: Watney alone, NASA (and later the Chinese Aerospace Administration), and the united Hermes crew. Because the book has enough space, the author can use various POVs to spread the exchanges and collisions between different people. The film also tries to restore this, but after all, the time is too short (the New Zealand version is 141 minutes, but it still feels short. Is there any), so I feel that the characterization is weak, especially for the Hermes astronauts. Except for the commander, if the others can have a little more background and personality, it would be better (the screenwriter is too Are you lazy...?). Finally, I have to say that Matt Damon’s acting skills support the skeleton of this movie, because Watney in the original book is very funny, very optimistic, and very confident, but the most important thing is not Superman, but very mortal. At this point, it’s not good for the engineer to perform too much or too constrained, but Ma’s classmate’s performance, I think, happens to show the spirit of the original book eight to nine points. the most important is, I didn’t go in a sensational direction. As an audience from beginning to end, I didn’t feel pity for him. Because I am too familiar with him). The above said that the screenwriter’s laziness is actually a joke. Compared with the original work, the connection between the events on Mars and the engineers who worked hard to help at NASA. These pens and inks are basically taken over in the book, or were scolded by Watney. I have brought it, but there are many shots in the movie that are interspersed with contrasts. These look very cool and exciting. They have the demeanor of "Apollo XIII" (I still remember the alternate astronauts on the ground in the simulator. Are those shots inside?). In fact, when I was writing these, I wanted to read it again.
View more about The Martian reviews
