The answer is no. Except for Galgado's beauty and figure, there is really nothing to see. "Wonder Woman" is a film that DC can't afford to lose. If "Wonder Woman" hits the street again, their next "Justice League" will fall into an embarrassing situation where they will lose ground. But at least from the current point of view, whether it is imdb or Rotten Tomatoes, it is considered to be mostly praised, which makes me suspect that I may have watched a fake "Wonder Woman". Many people say that DC Comics has finally fought a turnaround. I have never watched "Batman v Superman" and "Suicide Squad", but just how bad those films are to make the audience see such "Wonder Woman" automatically. The climax... Probably because it was filmed by a female director. "Wonder Woman" is full of silly and sweet temperament. It is hard to imagine that this director has filmed "The Devil" and one of my favorite American dramas "Murder" before. "Is it brainwashed by the producer?" As soon as Diana came out of the mountain, she knew that the first opponent she encountered was Ares, the god of war, and chased after her foolishly. What's the basis? In the end, why did Ares go out to a duel with Diana, and tell his opponent the key, what good is it for him? A little girl talked all day about saving the world, she was too virgin, this character did not grow up from start to finish, and finally she forcibly sublimated a grand theme of saving the world with love. I was speechless. The other is that the overall characterization is too feminine. Only Steve is more complete because he is Diana’s man. The other supporting characters are all blurred. The function of the few team members is to take a picture together, everyone’s. The ability is not shown clearly. "Wonder Woman" has gorgeous and highly performative action scenes. I can’t help but want to laugh every time I watch it, especially the beginning of the paradise island paragraph, the kind of gymnastics-like fancy archery, and the archer hanging from the cliff. The scene I came down suddenly made me cross to the "Great Wall". The action design here seems to serve to show Gal Gadot's figure, running and jumping, flashing and moving, no matter how tossing his body is spotless. Bulletproof wristbands and Aegis, maybe there is nothing unreasonable in the comics. It is a bit ridiculous to put them in the movie. I want to let the enemy shoot only within the protection range of the two wristbands in the rain of bullets. Isn’t it even more difficult for the goddess to block bullets with her wristband? Fortunately, for many people, the beauty of Galgado can be seen. In fact, for me, there is nothing to be fascinated by such over-exquisite facial features, not to mention the performance is so bad, the literary and martial arts are not good enough, it is really beautiful to cover a hundred ugliness. Originally out of boredom with Marvel, I am still looking forward to the rise of DC, but from now on, although Marvel is becoming more and more silly and sweet, but in plot and character design Shang is still a bit more mature than the current DC. The audience does not necessarily need DC to become another Marvel, but need him to take a more unique and stylized path, such as Nolan's "Batman Prequel" series. I think the style of "Wonder Woman" is not DC The creative direction it should be.
View more about Wonder Woman reviews
