This Chinese name is unable to spit out...

Rosalee 2021-10-20 18:58:07

Only a country without history like the United States can make such a movie that is both full of historical mysticism and light-hearted, because they are shooting other people’s history and they are not responsible for the nation to which the history belongs, so they have no creations. Burden on the burden. Today, more than 30 years later, the content of this movie is outdated (thin and boring), but its form is still the golden ratio and mainstream direction in this era of commodity economy, even more mainstream than before. After all, the audience nowadays increasingly believe that film and reality should be clearly distinguished. Of course, this is mainly the "crime" of the times, although the times are unconsciously determined by each of us.

Tyra 2021-10-20 18:59:37

I always remember watching a foreign movie at home on a weekend afternoon in my childhood where the actor secretly sneaked into the submarine base. Before I finished watching, my mother was taken to the military area to participate in the violin performance. I didn't expect that the movie was the Ark of the Ark. As a film in 1981, the degree of compactness and the number of development paths are still top-notch today, and this style has even been used in the Adventures of Tintin. The most unexpected thing for me was the ending, which was too big a brain in those days.