What a simple story, I don't know what the sprayers are spraying? I watched the movie and looked at the film reviews to know the true story. The first comment of the first film review I saw was about the director, the actors, the starting point of the story, and the main theme of the movie. I want to express to the fans what I think after watching this movie.
One, about the theme of the movie. This movie actually has no theme, and there is nothing Eastwood wants to express. It's just telling a story, telling the story of a sniper that really happened in the US-Iraq War. It is very rational, and it does not glorify American soldiers. Demonizing Muslims, the story is told in vain, but this is the attitude one should have when telling a rational question. The director has very old experience and knows what kind of story should be shot with what kind of attitude. Regarding anti-war, human nature, and post-war trauma, the director didn't want to express too many opinions at all. He just wanted to express it rationally and objectively, so that you can learn more about what you don't know through this story. I don't understand why the sprayers use this point to spray, saying that the movie is not good, not good, or bad.
Second, about the rhythm and timing of the movie. My evaluation is very good, but there are some places where the plot is a bit blunt. The film is told in order, but there is a little flashback in the first march, which is based on the previous attitude. Then Troll says it's not exciting, and a running account, should a documentary movie be a flashback in the time and space of the story? But add another two-line narrative to burn your brain? People who spray this are sick.
Three, the story itself. Someone spit on the story itself. This is what I don’t understand. It is said that the United States invaded Iraq, and the heroes were invaded as a result, big brother, this movie is not about the Iraq war itself, okay, it’s really about a person in the war. , A small part of the war, okay? After watching the movie clearly, let’s spit it out. War is cruel. There is no winning or losing. Maybe there is no so-called right or wrong, justice, but the coming of war is determined by a soldier. This is the decision of the decision-making level. Soldiers. Obeying orders is a mission. Chris has a good interpretation of the identity of a soldier. He did his job. He did his job. He did his job. He protected his comrades. Is it wrong? There is a child in your scope, but he is holding a grenade to die with your comrades in arms. Chris killed him. Is this wrong? Should I watch this kid blow up a brother in his platoon? It can only be said that the terrorists are too crazy and the war is too cruel. No matter how bad you are, you should be Bush or Osama bin Laden or something, and the protagonist knows his own professional and ethical bottom line when he struggles in his heart, it is not a brainless killing. What do you do in this situation? Those who don't understand what Tanzi are thinking, why do they spray Chris, Tanzi's heart is really like a starry sky, I can see but I don't understand.
These are my opinions. Before I saw the last black text, I completely thought that this story was just a fiction. In the end, I was really touched. I felt sorry for the hero. Whether it was a story or a movie, the filming was very good, so I gave it five stars. I hope that Chinese movie fans can see more of the positive side when looking at things in the future, look at things rationally, and don't always express negative and negative emotions.
View more about American Sniper reviews
