This film review is completely selfish. If it is biased, it must be deliberate.
Movie directors, whether you are shooting for the United States or the US team or whatever, you must really like the role of Iron Man.
He is awesome enough, he wants to look good, he wants money and money, he wants weapons and weapons, and he wants IQ and IQ. This kind of panacea-like setting is used to round off the screenwriter who is not strong enough-an enemy against the sky? Iron man. Nuclear bombs bombard New York? Iron man goes to the top. There is no villain in Reunion 2? Iron man made. The fuse of the civil war? Iron man's fault.
Iron man is a brick, and move it wherever it is needed.
As soon as the subtitle "Civil War" of Team US 3 came out, fans were bombed. Everyone wanted to see Captain America vs. Iron Man, to see what kind of tragedy it is for two aspects of the same justice to be forced to fight because of different concepts. In the end, it was not the case at all. The Iron Man acted as a big villain throughout the whole process. First, he played the most annoying people, "the running dog of the government", and then turned into an emotional bastard who ran away for his parents and beat his teammates. In contrast, the US team has continued the image of defying power and a sense of justice in the previous parts, which is respectable and admired.
My friends, after watching the movie, all expressed their support for Captain America from a standpoint, because he was on the side of the people, and he supported Iron Man emotionally, because it was a bit miserable for him to die and betray others.
This is probably the most dissatisfied point in the wonderful US Team 3 movie: Iron Man is one of the parties in the civil war, and his ideas are buried in action scenes and emotional disputes by the director. Iron Man is by no means just an unreasonable sentimental act, he has a sense of justice and a sense of responsibility comparable to the other teams. Even if he betrayed his relatives, he doesn't need sympathy-this is the most awesome Iron Man.
Tony Stark was an unwavering activist from the beginning.
We all remember his powerful debut-how could Iron Man become Iron Man? Being kidnapped by terrorists and piercing shrapnel in the heart is at any time life-threatening. In that case, Tony stuffed a reactor into his chest and built the first set of iron armor under countless muzzles.
If you change to an ordinary person, you may be desperate long ago, and surrender before the next day. Replaced by a person with a sense of justice and super stubbornness like Captain America, may take the happy route of desperately destroying the enemy and rescuing the oppressed people. Tony is not like that, what he thinks is always the most practical: the most pressing problem before him is to survive, then to escape, and then to save the world. So, start by designing the drawings of the armor.
This is the same as Matt Damon in "The Martian", instead of thinking about life and death and other big issues, it is better to think about how to grow potatoes with poop on Mars. The very familiar routines, the technical house knows all.
In the face of sudden problems and disasters, the Iron Man will not argue or discuss whether this is in line with the country's righteousness. The first thing he did was to solve the problem.
Therefore, in Reunion 1, when the nuclear bomb flew to New York, the Iron Man had no time to talk to other people, and directly rushed into space holding the nuclear bomb.
He would not think about whether this is good, whether it would appear less "groupistic", whether it would cause panic among the masses, and would not even think about whether he himself would die. After solving the nuclear bomb, let's discuss everything else. This is his style.
Unfortunately and fortunately, Iron Man is still a futurist. He firmly believes in the future, and his eyes are always far away-the combination of such a vision and efficient action has turned Iron Man into a very terrible guy: What he fears in his mind is that it will happen in the distant future. Threat. Even if they are just beginning to emerge, the Iron Man will be very active to solve the problem-as a result, his actions have been misunderstood.
The panic about God's Domain made Tony concentrate on researching and creating the Iron Legion.
To prevent the Hulk from losing control, Tony built anti-Hulk armor.
Worried about the future when the Avengers are all annihilated, Tony creates Ultron.
In order to prevent superheroes from triggering public crises, Tony actively promotes government signings.
Judging from the results, such actions have put Iron Man on the back a lot, and not every move of him brings peace. Therefore, many people say that the iron man is responsible for the troubles, and all the members of the reunion will clean up the mess, but they have not thought about it-if there is no iron man, wouldn't these accidents happen?
The fuse of the civil war was the huge casualties caused by Ultron and the death of innocent people caused by the Red Witch during the mission. Governments of various countries jointly proposed an agreement, hoping that the superhero will be bound by the government from now on. The captain opposed, the iron man supported, and the two sides went to war.
The iron man's position does not look so good, he is on the side of the government-the opposite of the people. I think this is the reason why many people do not support Iron Man. His position does not seem to be so righteous.
However, let us look at the problem from another angle.
Iron man and team leader are like engineers and product managers. The engineer is responsible for technical details and providing solutions, while the product manager is responsible for user investigation and quality control. As users, we are born to have a more favorable impression of product managers, because he is kind and pleasant and knows how to think from the user's standpoint. However, no matter how beautiful the user's needs are, the engineer who finally writes the code to realize it is the engineer. User needs that cannot be achieved technically are nothing but a fantasy.
Therefore, when the product came out, we blamed the engineer because it was not user-friendly. It was so strange-the engineer was only responsible for the realization of the idea. If the product is not easy to use, the engineer will not recite it.
When the Red Witch said that the Iron Man was under house arrest, when the captain said that it was useless to sign a contract and he would not sign anyway, when the Hawkeyes, Falcons and Ant-Man mocked the Iron Man together, I really want to say that you can do it? This sentence means literally here. If you are not satisfied with the signing, please don't just pull your face down and fight and say that anyway, I don't sign, and it has nothing to do with me if the matter cannot be resolved. Anyway, I am a partner of justice. What about other superheroes? What about ordinary people? If you don't sign a contract, then what exactly is used to restrain the behavior of superheroes? Fulian owes the world an explanation. Who will bear this pot?
It's still an iron man. There is no filming in the movie, but the comics are very clear. From beginning to end, the iron man is dealing with the government, the iron man is facing the pressure of the media, and the iron man is the one who came to the door crying and spit on the face of the victim's family. The other heroes hide behind the mask and wait for the fate to be judged, and the iron man is the one who controls the fate. When absolute justice cannot be achieved, the Iron Man, like the US team, tries to find a balance between the hero's freedom and order.
I have no intention of accusing the US team, he is perfect as a product manager. If it were not for him to firmly resist the pressure and refuse to sign, things would slide in an even more uncontrollable direction. In the comics, how many superheroes have been attacked because of the real-name system. On the other hand, the iron man as an engineer is equally good. The iron man always seems to be in trouble because he is the most active person, trying and fighting again and again until he succeeds-
he did not have a team spirit in the reunion 1, but used him to extremes in the later stage. Individualism saved New York, turned the Stark Tower into the Avengers Tower, and saved the team.
In Reunion 2, he tried to protect the world with Ultron, but it was counterproductive. However, the vision to restrain Ultron was also from the iron man.
In this movie, he actively promoted the signing but caused the team to break up. After learning the truth, he single-handedly went to find the captain and the Winter Soldier to join the fight to encircle and suppress the villains.
The Iron Man did cause a lot of trouble. However, which of these things he did was not to save the world? Only by constant trial and error can you get a good product. Even college students who haven't started a career understand this, but superheroes don't. If engineers are required to write error-free code, it is estimated that Google and Apple have not yet established it.
Tony Stark is far from a perfect person. He is emotional, self-serving, and extremely individualistic. Many things are done so badly that they almost destroy the world if they are not careful. The comics also pulled Spider-Man into the battlefield, almost killing him.
There are too many shadows and worries buried in his heart. When his parents passed away when he was young and frivolous, he was accused of becoming a military giant as an adult, but he could not keep even a true lover under the title of Playboy. Even so, Tony will still come back to face the next problem. Because of these worries, his views on the future are full of anxiety, and he is skeptical of overly powerful forces such as Thor and Hulk.
It is precisely because the Iron Man is far from perfect that the existence of the captain is crucial. He is the kind of person who can stand firm no matter how strong or weak he is, whether his opponent is big or small. So the captain is the leader and weather vane for the Avengers, and more like a brake for the iron man. The Iron Man may not follow the captain loyally like the Falcons and the Winter Soldier, but he will be pulled back by the captain when he is about to derail. The captain’s sarcasm about the Iron Man in the 1st period of the reunion, the language repeated by the captain in the 2nd period of the reunion (laughs) and the discussion about the hero’s future when chopping wood and feeding the horse, as well as the captain’s insistence on justice in this movie, all remind the iron man: This is the direction you should go, even to save the world, don't deviate too much.
So the battle between the US team and the Iron Man at the end of the movie is really sad. The meaning of the Winter Soldier to the captain is about the same as the meaning of his parents to the Iron Man, so after the Winter Soldier was brainwashed again, the line of the captain has deviated from justice and turned to selfishness. On the contrary, Iron Man was the one who had been trying to maintain the overall situation. When he was finally provoked and out of control by the villain, his selfishness overwhelmed his sense of justice, and no one put the brake on him anymore.
Simplifying the plot of the civil war into a private fight, this is probably Marvel's method to prevent the plot from going dark. But in this way, whether the captain or the iron man, the justice they insisted on was buried in the blood of the three vulgarities. When the audience walked out of the cinema, they only remembered the captain’s love for the Winter Soldier (fog), and The tragedy of the iron man with red eyes to avenge his parents.
When everyone added justice points to TeamCap and sentiment points to TeamIronman, I just want to say that the justice of the iron man has always been there. It may not be so good, but it is it that saves the world time and time again.
There are always people who say, look, how miserable Iron Man was in the end. Watching the video of his parents being killed, all the people betrayed, the good friends broke their legs, the girlfriends ran away, and the winner of life became the down-and-out middle-aged uncle.
Can we not judge Tony Stark by our happiness standards. He is still a billionaire genius entrepreneur Playboy Futurist, and the last thing Tony needs is sympathy. Pure men never look back at the explosion. In the past few incidents, Tony has never regretted it, and this time it is the same. He always looks to the future, and the next time the earth suffers an extinction, he will still wear iron armor and fly into the sky.
Because as early as Iron Man 1, before he had the Avengers, had not married Little Pepper, had not yet met the legendary Captain Rogers, had not yet become the real father of Vision, he could be proud of the camera. Say:
I'm Ironman.
It's just a start over now.
PS wrote this film review for Iron Man with passion. The language must be exciting, and the position must be biased. I can't help but do my best.
PS2 In fact, the roles of the captain and the Winter Soldier were also very wronged. Neither of them had the opportunity to perform well. Especially the Winter Soldier, there was no emotional drama since the memory was restored. His remorse for the past and his determination to survive well did not unfold. I always feel that the director gave up the role in order to promote CP.
PS3 Black Panther and Spider-Man are indeed the highlights. Personal movies too!
View more about Captain America: Civil War reviews
