The following statement of views on Batman vs. Superman:
Content:
1. A tribute to the classic elements,
mainly the return of the two dark knights and the death of Superman. This doesn’t really need to be mentioned, what we comic fans look forward to most before is tribute and depth.
2. Characters are out of shape and not full
1.
Perhaps the closest Batman to the original but the most disintegrated in history is the soundtrack? Maybe it's Lex Luthor this time? I had an illusion half of what I saw: Isn't Batman the villain?
Ben Affleck’s performance is impeccable. Yes, in his part, he perfectly interprets the Batman side. Bruce Wayne actually makes sense. The setting is older, darker, more worldweary. But the fatal injury lies in him. Darker seems too hard. The reason for Batman and Superman is not so much that Luther's conspiracy is impeccable, but that Batman is hot-headed and wants to do it. Don't spray it when you see it, and taste it yourself after watching the movie. All the Batman activities before Batman and Superman were to get kryptonite. Luther's conspiracy stimulus effect is there. There may not be the stimulation of Luther's conspiracy. Batman just collects kryptonite for spare use.
Batman had a nightmare, and he flinched when he saw Superman approaching, but the two-barreled easter egg flashed by without deep digging. The part of going to Wayne Manor has not been noticed and touching. It's more like Batman's declaration: I'm going to hunt. .
Maybe Ben Affleck is too facial paralysis. The real Batman is facial paralysis, but when he is in love, he may look down on his hometown, or he may tear off his hood. This is Batman.
Is the dark knight returning to black? Black, but humane. Because there is a description of the feelings of Ertong, there is a description of the feelings of Kelly: good soldier, the rest such as the bond with Harvey Dante, and the clown show the character of Batman very plump, and the Batman of bvs is resourceful. Technology fights are very good, but impersonal. Really, I really don't want to mention him killing people like hemp. Since this Batman is angry except for anger, what is the point of killing a few people.
I think I have completed the task, which is not bad, but it is basically not his fault.
This is already the best Batman, not black, mainly because the previous ones are less like the real Batman...
2. Superman
Superman is the real protagonist, because the depiction of Superman is quite full, The characters did not collapse, but Henry was beautiful, but he was too murderous. This is really, um, of course you said that the new 52 is indeed so, but who said that the comics must be perfect?
Superman can accept it.
3. Luther
Lu Bale, who has the shadow of a clown, used a little too much force. One is unnecessary but actually did away Messi... the lines are too pretending, this is regarded as innovation. Lu Tu's mental temperament reached half. Luther was not a pure villain. Although Luther said that he wanted to limit Superman for the sake of mankind, he was rather pure jealous, and knowledge and power were not equal. And in terms of ruthlessness, it was really ruthless, and Lu Tu was still not so ruthless.
4. Wonder Woman
can only be regarded as an introductory character, some of her words reflect some of her right and wrong views and experience, one stroke, forcibly inserted, because her existence is unnecessary except to tie up the day of destruction and save Batman.
5. Ah Fu, Louis Lane, Martha Kent, and Jun Finch
are all good.
3. The deadly plot loopholes
Batman vs. Superman, the name is this, isn't the most important thing about their play? Inserting the Day of Doom to force a climax, making Superman half-dead, and bringing it into Wonder Woman, and introducing the concept of Justice League ruined the end. I analyzed it carefully, including Batman's suggestion to find the Flash. They were the Darkside Nightmare before. The Flash called the police for the foreshadowing. It made sense. But if you say that because you want Batman to fight Superman to end the Batman and Superman’s mother’s name, forcibly using the same name as Superman’s mother, Superman is inexplicably not saying to save his mother but to save Martha, so you force Thomas Wayne to call Martha’s name before his death, So Louis was magically made a rescue when Batman could kill Superman at any time.
Forgive me for not reading comics. The logic of comic change is understandable. If it is so forced, it is not a problem of logic. It is a problem of attitude. Is the screenwriter's salary too low and passively sabotaging?
The structure is
old, and the timing of civil and martial arts plays is out of balance. The scum leader is indeed a painter, not a writer.
The multi-line arrangement is actually good.
I won't talk about other slots.
To sum up: the ambition is too big, the logic of trying to make a big scene is wrong, the character portray time is squeezed too much, the director and screenwriter have a fundamental deviation in the understanding of some characters from the comics. Pretending to be deep but not deep, and not a family love, can only rely on playing and playing to add special effects, and the popularity of the characters wins respect.
Disappointment.
View more about Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice reviews
