This has caused me to think after watching the movie. Why do I care so much about whether a heroic character will appear when I watch the movie? I think it is because the guest appearance of Mr. Stan Lee has become one of the Marvel movies. If you don’t see the big sign, he always feels unreliable in his heart. Secondly, you have to admit that even though the film producers have tried all kinds of tricks, one problem has become more and more obvious, that is, the audience’s aesthetic fatigue.
The reason why I looked for Stan Lee with my heart is because I didn’t worry about the development of the plot at all. It is like other Marvel superhero movies, or other Hollywood lone hero movies, but It's because they are all based on Marvel's comics, so these Marvel movies are more like a milk compatriot.
Of course I know that Marvel’s superheroes have their own characteristics, and I can see that the film producers try to make their own movies according to the characteristics of different heroes, but I have to say that there are some movies developed by Marvel in recent years. With the blowout, no matter how hard the producer is, it will inevitably be the same. In addition, there are so many storytelling methods in Hollywood in the United States, and it is always inseparable to use the flowers. If you apply the same superhero theme, I think that aesthetic fatigue will be inevitable.
I just hope that Marvel should take a good look at the quality level. Now that the audience is more and more familiar with their routines, then ask them to pay more attention to the details, and the special effects and lines should also be as refined as possible, so that at least those who have already been Audiences who are no longer curious about the plot are bored when watching a movie. Don’t let the movie end up as a fan movie, don’t let their grand blueprint of the story come to an end, don’t let this type of movie fall into the cold. It is considered to be consummation of merit.
As for this film, I think it is still qualified. From special effects to characters, it is considered above the standard. The performance of several actors is also quite satisfactory. However, Michael Douglas is obviously more prominent. I think it is not because of the number of characters he starred in. Excellent, but the actor's own aura is too strong, and it can hold the audience without acting. The details of the film are pretty good. The rap brother is a joke maker. The tank key chain that keeps appearing is also explained at the end. The two easter eggs (remember that there are two) after the feature film also make people feel. The waiting for the subtitles is not in vain, maybe this is also because the upcoming ones are always more anticipated than the past ones, right?
View more about Ant-Man reviews
