[Build]: Open the story with a mysterious fragment of memory. The building part uses two perspectives to cross the narrative. One is the peaceful life of Byrne and Mary, and the other is that the CIA was blocked when investigating the internal ghost who embezzled public funds. The agent was killed, and the clue pointed to Byrne. At the same time, Byrne's peaceful life was also broken. An unknown killer assassinated Byrne, but killed Mary by mistake. The screenwriter used Mary's death as plot point 1 to complete the script for the script (really cruel), and the three main forces in the movie showed their faces and pushed the story to confrontation.
[Confrontation]: What is that fragmentary memory that has been repeatedly emphasized? Why was Byrne still hunted down after Jinpen washed his hands and retreated to the world? Together with the audience, the ignorant protagonist begins the process of obtaining information. After the fingerprints of the Berlin incident, various clues were presented, which made the CIA focus on Berne. Against this stage, the forces that killed Mary had almost no direct interference with Byrne, so the CIA was mainly responsible for setting obstacles to the protagonist and creating dramatic work.
Byrne landed in Naples, and Byrne went to Germany to find an agent (I really didn't understand their relationship, if readers who understand it, please trouble me)-Byrne collected stories from the CIA and Pan's information .
Byrne tried to snipe Pan, and arranged a meeting with the female CIA agent of the previous work-to gradually piece together the fragmentary memories of Byrne, Nista, a Russian who died violently; Albert, the person in charge of the stone stepping operation, two names The story is pushed to Nista's burial place: Blake Hotel.
During the investigation at the Blake Hotel, Byrne remembered the past, and this old murder case was ordered by Albert's self-interest.
What is it? why? Both issues are explained. The story is round. As evidenced below the mountain, Albert committed suicide. The CIA's corruption case came to an end. I think this is plot point 2. The story needs an ending. Byrne needs to give an explanation to the dead Mary. So the train and camera went straight to Russia. In the confrontation stage, the third force finally had a chance to act.
[Ending] There is nothing to say about the ending. After some chasing, Byrne defeated the killer who came after him, but finally did not kill him. The Russian side also arrested the man behind the scenes. Several times before foreshadowing, Bourne finally came to the home of the Niesta couple’s daughter and apologized to her. This is a scene that moved me a lot, and Bourne's previous choices have also received a reasonable explanation. Because I have also lost the one I love, I feel the pain in it. He regarded this fate as punishment.
The first time I wrote about Mission Impossible 5, this time I found it to be a lot more difficult to analyze. The plot of Bournemouth 2 is more complicated than that of Mission Impossible 5. There are many scenes with more information, and the compactness makes my clumsy brain difficult to turn around. In Mission: Impossible 5, the purpose is very clear, the villain also showed up early, so it's right to hit him. The Bournegro 2 is different. Albert is hiding behind the scenes most of the time, and he is a counter-thief who only jumped towards the end.
There are not many movies and not many action movies. It's rare to see such a wonderful film, but I still have to admire it. Action movies don’t just rely on drag racing, dazzling skills, fighting and stacking. You still have to tell the story carefully. You can’t simply find things and smash the villains. Otherwise, in 11 years, it won’t look like a spy. 2 is still good-looking.
View more about The Bourne Supremacy reviews
