Looking for bugs? If you look carefully, there is definitely more than this one, but this is boring. This is not the right attitude to watch movies like "Jurassic World". How good do you think other directors have? What happened to being chased by dinosaurs in the primeval forest in high heels? I also specially gave a close-up of high heels behind me, how cool? Shooting dinosaurs, wearing high-heeled shoes, eating and eating people, kissing and kissing. This is the creative principle of "Jurassic World". With a budget of almost $150,000, I made all dinosaurs? Do you still care about your broken high heels? I am up and down hundreds of thousands a second!
I'm sorry, but the chicken is frozen. I want to defend a Hollywood blockbuster like "Jurassic World". It will definitely attract criticism. I understand that. I never said that this movie is a good one, and I can never ask everyone to like it. Art criticism of Hollywood blockbusters is also necessary. But we can't always think about bicycles. For this kind of special effects blockbuster, it is the audio-visual pearl based on the Hollywood film industry. The cool special effects, the vigorous dinosaurs, are exciting without losing humor and emotional lines. The plot is especially suitable for watching on the IMAX giant screen. (However, this film is rated PG-13 in North America. There are content that is not suitable for children under 13 years of age. Don't take children to watch indiscriminately. There are some dinosaurs eating people and other violent scenes are really not suitable for children.) Then
again, If the technology is done well, it is art itself. Those flying in the sky, swimming in the water, running on the ground, big and small, eating meat and eating meat, so many dinosaurs, compared to the era of "Jurassic Park", the impression It has been greatly improved-the highest state of special effects is to make you not feel the existence of special effects. In this regard, "Jurassic World" is very successful.
As for clichéd stories, I think it depends on how you look at it. "Popular" does not mean "vulgar". Does literature and art serve the workers, peasants and soldiers? It is beyond reproach that the movie serves the paying audience.
An interesting topic is the villain in the film. Of course, criticizing the profitable capitalists is a reserved project, but in the end "good dinosaurs" beat "bad dinosaurs", and the biggest boss is still a "bad guy" with "genetically modified". The resurrected dinosaurs are not terrible. Some dinosaurs have even been domesticated, and the biggest mosasaur jumped out of the water and played the role of terminator.
What kind of genetic hybridization is all translated as "transgenic". Therefore, in "Jurassic World", the biggest demon technology is this genetic modification. Once the gene is transformed, the good will turn into the bad, and the bad thing will be bad.
Reminiscent of the previous genetically modified rice controversy, which involves professional scientific and technological knowledge and complex scientific ethics and sociological issues. I have no intention of getting involved in the debate. Anyway, I don’t eat genetically modified foods myself, nor let my family eat genetically modified foods, genetically modified foods. Whether there is harm, this matter can be disputed, but I have my choice.
I'd rather be more expensive, save money for buying high heels for my family, and buy non-GMO.
View more about Jurassic World reviews
