Let me talk about the ugly one that I find the most difficult to perform. The dispute between him and his brother and those little prayers were often used when he saw the dead. He knelt down in front of Jesus. When he acted with the good one, he satirized the good one with Judas. The feeling was that he only wanted to Be a pastor or priest, but his fate doesn't favor him. So he chose to fall for himself...but what he said when he prayed might be different from what he really thought in his heart.
At the beginning of the film, the good one left him in the desert, and he "drags" the good one into the desert. These two contrasts tell me what is a villain, what is a villain, you lend me three points and I want you to pay me back seven point. The vibrancy of the despicable and shameless being interpreted by Wallach is vivid. Especially after the good one "redeemed him", what he exchanged was not gratitude and fear after a catastrophe, but cursing and anger. There is no tolerance and gratitude, no principles and integrity. the ugly-only this word can define this category, not even the bad one.
The bad one, seems to be holding a gun, but is actually digging a grave. He has his own professional ethics, and he has "integrity" in his own business. If the ugly has no face (dignity), the bad one has no feelings. ——Ugly one will weep and sad for the death of his father, and is proud of telling good one about his brother. Bad one can only be calm, he quietly watched the gunfire outside, quietly watching several bountyers fighting with good ugly. He will always reap the benefits and only play the role of oriole. Every time I see him appearing, I shudder and think in my heart-when it's over, someone is going to die.
The good one, in my impression or before watching a movie, must be tall and majestic-noble and great with a halo of good people on his head. After watching it thoroughly, he first colluded with ugly, and then "cooperated" with ugly bad one for gold coins: as long as people are in any camp, they must survive, and money is the most important thing. He has a foresight and bottom line: After spending a long time with the villain, he will easily become a villain, so he throws away the useless ugly. Is the villain cowardly? Why would Good follow him obediently across the desert when Ugly captures Good? The person almost died, is it just because Ugly has a gun in his hand instead of expressing the cowardice of good? A little confused. The last two things in the story—helping the captain to realize his dream and supporting a Southerner disease to the end of his life all reflect the core of good—tolerance, compassion and help others.
The three images are very successful and the story links are also clever. Misunderstandings and conflicts flow inadvertently. At the end, the sad and majestic accompaniment released the long-depressed things in the front of the story. Ugly's shaking shots between the tombs make the tombstone more like a living person standing there. In the center circle, the three are standing opposite each other, and the "key" is placed in the middle. It gives me the feeling that all living beings face the vile struggle between good and evil in their hearts when they face their interests. Including the three of them is just a drop in history. This kind of introspection and thinking about human nature and war cannot be expressed in words. Language and writing are pale, and what remains in the neuron conduction is unforgettable, but sometimes it is unprepared.
View more about The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reviews
