The film developed to the second part, still following the plot of the first part, with a little bit of innovation. The story of unity and division is inevitably a bit clichéd. It also has the omnipotent ability to unite and fight. The foreign enemy made the villain look a little vulnerable. Ultron, who was beaten everywhere, had to be said to be a rather tragic character. He had to destroy the earth to achieve the goal of destroying the Avengers. Is it a bit too eager to get some? Since it is able to manipulate the global network and the military power of all countries can be used for him, why bother to build an army by yourself and wait for the hero team to fight monsters and upgrades. The militaries of various countries did not reflect the feat of destroying the earth at all, and did not fully highlight the powerful military power of the United States. Is it too grandiose to rely on a few superhero alliances alone? This is not as good as "Transformers". The American army saves the world together. That is a truly meaningful commercial movie. It only highlights the individual heroism of the League of Legends without a strong military force to back it up. How does the story look and feel something is wrong? If the director can make a superhero In reality, it would not appear that the entire alliance is like an unrecognized illegal group, and it is not being seen by others. It is burdened with the huge mission of saving the world, but it is isolated and helpless everywhere. This inevitably makes this superhero team look too disgraced. Embarrassed. The use of a lonely hero to explain heroism only applies to one person, but for a group, it is obviously out of place, especially after such a big disaster has been created. In the end, they can pat their buttocks and leave easily. There is no government in the world. In my eyes, it is out of ordinary reality. In fact, the IQ of the movie is not ordinary naive.
For superheroes with disparate personalities, they shouldn't form a group, because there is no convincing team core in this group. How can there be strong combat effectiveness without the judgment of status level? Although the movie has been strengthening Captain America as the core of a team, his influence is too weak and too weak. He can't control other team members at all, and he has no more powerful combat ability than other members. He is often ridiculed and malicious. Confrontation, face sweeping, how can it be possible to command a team that is convincing? Moreover, the main line of the story in the movie did not follow the character of Captain America. Not only did it not increase the proportion of Captain America in the length of the movie, it also failed to deepen him as the most important member of the Avengers. How could it be possible for him to become The core of the team can only say that this superhero league is only temporary. Everyone is not indispensable. Every hero will not be affected if they leave. We can also see from the ending of the movie, and cultivate the second generation. The Avengers are proof that they are setting up the flag of the core of the team and re-establishing the status of Captain America as the core of the team, thereby replacing the role of this generation of brave and mixed forces.
For this Avengers movie, the story of the movie is chaotic, it can be described as forgetting, while making trouble, while recalling the past, while talking about love, while avenging hatred, mixed with too many emotional elements in it. To truly bring out the heroism of justice, I have to say that it is very regrettable. More and more superheroes are recruited, and the team is building bigger and bigger. The pattern of the movie map also releases huge ambitions, but The plot of the movie is getting more and more ugly. The story begins to become arbitrary. I have the heart to shoot wherever I want, as long as it can lead to the emergence of new heroes, regardless of whether the movie has a plot or not.
View more about Avengers: Age of Ultron reviews