movie is really exciting. It started with a royal agent knocking on the door of the criminals, and answering what he came to do, saying I said I was here to borrow a fire, was it too fake? It started. A series of clean and beautiful After fighting and shooting, he did not commit many of the bugs frequently committed by gangster actors in gangster films—for example, neglecting the criminals who walked away to pour alcohol or even being KO—this agent gracefully killed people, and then took over 62 years. Smell the wine, tell the year and its advantages. The gentleman said: This kind of wine can't live up to..." The
series of actions were overwhelming, educating people to applaud, but unexpectedly, this is just to pave the way for a real surprise That's it...
However, as my friend Dan Shen said on Weibo, it's actually just popcorn pieces.
There are so many exquisite details and exceptionally good graphics, but after all, they can't conceal the common old-fashioned storylines. Although it is not fragmented, but the focus is not properly handled, and I want to describe growth, and I want to show conspiracy and spying. As a result, the secret service school has become a cutscene. The students in it are to accompany the prince to study, and they give so many lines to the story. Usefulness; the conspiracy theory is also very old-fashioned, that is, human beings are viruses, and I scrape bones for Mother Earth. As a result, it seemed that two unrelated films had to be kneaded together. You don’t even know which one is the protagonist.
(2) The
director said that the current 007 movies are too serious. So, there are all the fun elements that this movie should have, including spoof, inspiration, growth, spying, killing, romance, blasting, ambition, selling corruption, and gorgeous and gorgeous death scenes... everything is enough. Interesting and relaxing enough.
I have also been unable to stand the new version of 007. The New Bond was always sullen and acting cool, was beaten up and down, crying, and struggling to hide and use the bunker to protect himself. The last Bond, Piercenan, has liked him since the "Legend of Steele" starring him in the 1980s-a gentleman with a polite and humorous demeanor, without the power to bind a chicken, but can face life and death without forgetting politeness and humor. Even if it is hung on the wall with scissors inserted in the collar. Although I actually don't like the 007 series of movies.
"Ace Agent" (why not directly translated as "Royal Agent", isn't the story about this organization) finally resembles a Bond in the traditional sense. They have so many spy items, huge weapon manufacturing factories, gorgeous identities, exquisite design, sharp skills, rigorous intelligence agencies, advanced technical geniuses, countless money, and even, they are not as good as the 007 intelligence organization. Many constraints.
So, they love how to play. In the beginning, he used a helicopter to penetrate into the enemy area, kill people with rocket launchers, drop bombs, and intimidate the enemy coldly... And this old agent played by Colin, with his gentleman’s demeanor, keen judgment, quick and beautiful skills, treats the enemy like an autumn wind. Falling leaves usually kills with one blow, but he treats his comrades with the same warmth as in the early spring, and he is so informed and interesting-all the advantages of 007 are reflected in him. In "Ace Agent", he is the protagonist in the true sense. Even if the role is only half, he is still dazzling to cover the whole film. At least, the film company will definitely make a sequel for him.
(3) The
director loves anti-tradition. He designed the growth of small characters in "King of the Sea", but he will let you know that after all, heroes do not grow up in a short time, so the dazzling heroes are super killers who have been trained since childhood. When it comes to his "Ace Agent", it's the opposite, taking back the tradition, because he hates that the current spy movies are always so serious that they are in the same tone as "Amnesia Agent (Bourne's Identity)". You can't see the deep bitterness What is the difference between New Bond and Byrne, who is always frowning and thinking.
The black villain in the movie played well, after all, it's the actor. The character design was wasted. Eventually fell into the tone of the bad guys knowing that he said bad guys. Originally, his heroic mentality of serving the earth wholeheartedly should be said to have spread well.
(4)
The colorful part of the movie is actually not fighting, not dazzling weapons, not conspiracy, not funny, but death scenes like fireworks blooming. This is the ingenuity of the director.
The scene of a hundred people beheaded was deleted in China, which made many people angry.
It was indeed a very exciting scene, although the shock was not enough (compared to the appearance of a super killer girl). But it is true that as the foreign media commented, it is normal for the director to behave violently, gore, and murderously, and it is also normal to present these in a tertiary film. However, when treating this as a pure display, the hobby of gushing blood is a manifestation of the director's pathology, which does not fit well with the murder scenes before and after the movie. Even, besides making people dazzled and fascinated, there is another psychology-boredom, and even nausea.
This has gone too far with the director's criticism that the new 007 is too serious and want to make an interesting movie.
Also amazing was the female killer, who appeared light and agile and danced but clean and thoughtful to kill, shocking the theater. At the end of the battle, it is also a good fight with "King of the Sea".
View more about Kingsman: The Secret Service reviews
