Then leave this errand to others.
Let me talk about the superficial perception of the film first: first of all, its experimental nature is extremely strong, and this kind of experiment is raised to a very high or even almost perfect level, just like Cameron and his 3D. It's not to say how rare a mirror is (and it's also fake), and it doesn't set a precedent, so the experimentality here refers more to the whole. The soundtrack of drums, which does not miss the sensibility but is actually very inflammatory, breaks the narrative structure into pieces and uses the lens to realize the cohesion and advancement of the story. The way is particularly amazing. It’s hard not to connect people to the list of Oscar nominations this year. This film has dominated so many things. It relies not on succumbing to the academic structure, but on its authoritative spirituality, and judging from the current momentum, Very competitive, there is no sign of accompany running, which makes friends who have been used to watching the academy movies of conformity proposition extremely excited for two or three consecutive years.
I have been listening to everyone's comments that this film satirizes many things in Hollywood, including film critics, assembly line commercial films, and so on. After reading, my personal opinion is as follows-
choose a more representative one. For example, Keaton scolded the film critics. I think his psychology is not pure, it may be more emotional. . The reason for saying this is that there is an obvious reference near the end: when film critics gave his performance a high praise and published in the newspapers, it can be well seen from the words of the fat man on the partner that he played this A real gun actually made him (As for why he had to reload at the time, the film did not give any more explanations, almost deliberately ignored, trying to deliberately convey the unimportant feeling, just like many of the film ignores the logic but does not attract people. The same disgusting passage), which gave him the influence he dreamed of. In this situation of the same nature but in a different situation, did he point to the sentence "Thomson subconsciously brought new life to the surreal, The blood of reality and metaphor was sprinkled in front of the artist and the audience at the same time, "swearing? Perhaps, very likely, most of his mind is enjoyable. I think this is a very ironic time, a double irony. His irony to film critics finally satirizes himself, it is obvious-still vanity.
The greatest interest of this movie, and at the same time the most attractive feature, is that it confuses the boundaries of reality and reality, and this feat breaks the screen. To prove this, you can ask a serious question like this: Will changing Birdman to Batman go against the peace?
There is only one reason for asking this: Michael Keaton, who played Batman in the 1980s and 1990s, is in the ranks of actors from the red to the decline, or not to say that it is a decline, but fades out of the mainstream sight. Just like what the film has always conveyed, for this group of stars who are eager to refresh their sense of existence, it is not terrible to play a role with a bad reputation, and even a bad box office is not terrible. The important thing is not these things, but The impact of these things is reputation. Remember, that is not reputation, reputation must be positive, that is reputation. In this era, a star needs only reputation, and sometimes those rigorous actions made for reputation are not good, because there is no explosion point, and there is no explosion point. If there is no explosion point, it will not get hot. Last word. The analysis point of this question is in what the daughter played by Sister Stone said when he held his father naked in a New York square: "There are 350,000 hits in less than an hour. Believe it or not, this is power." In their world, money is definitely inferior to fame and fortune, because money is not enough to satisfy their desires. He can live in the backstage of the theater, only to concentrate his energy and get an erection, in order to reappear in people’s sight. To be the center of other people’s lives is always more exciting than being the center of yourself. Therefore, I personally feel that Birdman is not a metaphor, but a symbol with both irony and universal meaning. What it represents is the simplest, rude and convenient thing for stars to become the focus, but at the same time it is contradictory to the real performance. For the moment, this kind of thing is acting as a superhero. The most interesting off-screen image is that this movie actually even the lineup is ironic-it brings together the older generation of Batman, Spider-Man's first love sweet sister, and the Hulk who has been replaced. unstoppable.
Looking back now, maybe there are a few words about the critic who was scolded for nothing but still cheeky? After thinking about this, think about the beginning of the movie for about ten minutes or so. That section was a spoof of Fassbender, Jeremy Reynolds and others. He said, "I can’t believe it, even he put on a cloak. Does it also contain hypocrisy? You might even sum it up with the following words: This movie is a play, this play is a group of people acting, and the representative of the acting saves lives by acting, and the movie uses a fictitious title as The title, and in fact, its ultimate goal is to rely on such a show to interpret the drama that uses acting to influence life and even life, so as to save the actor from the real crisis of middle-aged and elderly drama.
Relying on these more personal interpretations, I think this film is very genius, it realizes the irony of endless looping from the inside to the outside and biting the tail.
I also want to express my opinion. After watching the film’s handling of the ending, I had a thought. Would it be better if the film ended on the stage, that is, where the audience stood up and applauded after the shot? The imaginary space is left blank by a large margin, and it seems to be smoother and more beautiful. It’s his life to take care of him. In short, it reveals his state of selling his life, and it is so strange that "Sunset Boulevard" and "Black Mirror" are mixed together. The taste of one.
However, the real ending of the film is also left blank. It directly conveys that the protagonist did jump off the building, but he was not dead. Because the daughter’s eyes looked up and smiled, he turned into a birdman and flew away. . But I have to confuse the audiovisual here (in fact, it is not random thinking). After all, the director is very ambitious, and it also has the meaning of triggering associations, so it does not hurt to have more interpretations: the first possibility is just like the police in "The Prisoner". The simple smile and the spinning top of "Inception", the endings of these movies give people the feeling that they must be watched more, but they are shady at the critical moment of judgment. Then you might as well think about it, maybe your daughter is watching downstairs. In the future, will he smile bitterly and cry without tears? Yes, he is dead. That's what it means, this interpretation is more realistic. The second possibility is more imaginative, that is, the madness of the old man’s vague and unreal attitude towards life has affected the people around him. As a symbol of her daughter, she can see what the old man can also see and is right. For self-directed and self-acted things, everyone is a lunatic, yes, that's the phrase, "3D lunatic".
It is currently the best of the year, and it is also the first film of my winter vacation. It is really cool to start with this film. I just endured the last test of the final exam in the morning. I insisted on not watching movies for almost three weeks and not using Weibo for a week. , In exchange for this sourness, it's worth it. At the same time, I selected my last candidate "Disappearing Lover" and the first candidate "Interstellar".
View more about Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) reviews
