Last year's "Grand Piano" was also written by Damian Chazelle. Although the plot was terrible, it was not flattering, but through quick editing and close-up visual impact, it showed a very cool and gorgeous lens. "Frodo"'s superb piano skills presents an immersive audiovisual feast. "Burst Drummer" also continues this performance method, except that the piano is replaced with a drum set, from classical music to Jazz music is more passionate and appealing. The vigorous editing and various close-up close-ups, blood, sweat, expressions, music scores, and musical instruments not only reflect the difficulty and difficulty of success, strengthen the emotional expression of the characters, but also shock the music. He Charm uses the ups and downs with a vigorous sense of rhythm, displayed through the incisive pictures, thrown into the hearts of the audience, and finally throws out the Jedi counterattack. The perfect performance that is full of enjoyment is so enjoyable. This fresh meat director, who is only over 30, is also a good seed with a bright future that cannot be ignored.
After watching this movie, I have to sigh. Sometimes the actors have to be a little more capable than expected. Myers Teller’s ecstatic performance that completely ignores his life is awe-inspiring. Although the assistance of a substitute cannot be ruled out, but It can be seen that Teller still has two brushes, and the final solo is truly impeccable. It can be seen that if there is an outstanding high-end unique skill in hand, it can completely refresh the style in an instant. J.K. Simmons’ performance is also very eye-catching. Snape’s evil incarnation, with a poisonous tongue and the astonishing firepower with a dirty mouth, wounded people all over the body, and felt that he was sitting on the ground without the power to fight back. The roller coaster-like pleasure has evolved the image of a tyrant-like emotional horror coach to the bones, making people respect, hate and fear, adding another heavyweight cannonball to this year's Oscar's best male match. When I recommended this movie to a friend, I was asked if it was another bowl of chicken soup that I never tire of. I gave a firm denial. Instead, it was more like a bowl of dark dishes that violated inherent values.
Being humiliated, cursed, ridiculed, devalued, tortured you in the spiritual world at all possible uses, knead you, beat you, and held heaven for a second, then was kicked into hell one foot deep in a blink of an eye, with super height Fletcher of skill and devil soul carefully laid a harsh and cruel "road to success" for Andrew. Although Andrew's potential was gradually stimulated, his mind was also changing at the same time, bringing the negative energy in human nature into one. He was released. The goal of success occupied all his minds. He became extremely extreme, resentful, and arrogant. He gave up everything, but was brought into desperation by Fletcher. Just when Andrew finished his drumming career, It was Fletcher's appearance that gave him hope, but the following black-bellied blow did not make him completely unable to turn over. Instead, it inspired Andrew's amazing talents and erased the step from failure to success. After reading it, many people are constantly struggling and discussing whether Fletcher is "the ultimate test" or "the ultimate test." Excessive interpretation is useless, and different people have different opinions.
There are several dramatic and unexpected turns in the polarization of the film. In addition to improving the visibility of the plot, it also injects a ribbon of divergent depth into the theme of the film. Fletcher deplores his lover who died in a car accident. In fact, he committed suicide and died after suffering his cruel torture. This is a key intervention. It is an objective denial of Fletcher's teaching method, but it also forms a contradictory point of opposition to Andrew's success in the end, which has changed. The positive effect of negative to positive? Or does it have the negative power of one black to the end? In fact, this movie is more like standing in a neutral position. It has wonderfully proposed an unconventional possibility, whether it is a good medicine or a deadly poison. It is up to the audience to judge it, and it varies from person to person. Perhaps it has exceeded the boundaries of ordinary people and is powerful. The inner genius really needs some weird and extreme means to break through the cocoon and become a butterfly.
From the perspective of education, it is still unavoidable to let people fall into thinking. Is such guidance correct or feasible? After the wonderful performance, Andrew may have gained a reputation from then on, but the student who committed suicide due to depression never lost the opportunity to display his talents. Like Fletcher said, he can only give students satisfactory encouragement. Let him step in place in the mediocre realm, and use the radical method to help him. Only when he is dissatisfied with the status quo or transformed in setbacks can he burst out the blockbuster potential factors hidden in his body. There is no doubt that there is no denying reason. However, as the saying goes, teaching students in accordance with their aptitude, extreme agitation may be an effective method that can magically arouse a person's talents, but it may also ruthlessly ruin the dreams and talents of a talented teenager.
View more about Whiplash reviews
