Since most of the audience's movie thinking is still linear in time, it is estimated that this is the reason why Quentin did not cut the movie too out of the ordinary, and the audience can still easily understand it. Putting aside the narrative structure for the time being, you can find that the storyline is actually very exciting. Its characteristic is interlocking, each link/chapter has drama conflict.
Although most of the film narrative develops in time, the series of plots still adopt a loosely structured chapter structure. Then according to the timeline, the chapters can be arranged as follows: Two killers kills-manslaughter in the car and resolution (at the end of the film)-restaurant robbery (the film puts it at the beginning and end of the film)-to accompany shopping and drug accident ——Boxing escape——The gold watch was retaken——The chrysanthemum exploded tragically——Escape smoothly. According to the plot clues above, it can be found that the plot of the movie has a large amount of information, so the movie can be intertwined with endless surprises; at the same time, the plot is divided into different chapters, but each chapter is an independent unit with drama conflict. It's a separate article, no lack of appreciation.
Such a splendid plot, in fact, a two-stage film similar to "Chongqing Forest" can still be made according to the conventional narrative. The protagonist in the first half is Travolta, and the protagonist in the second half is Bruce Willis. The protagonist dies in the second half of playing soy sauce, does it reflect the feeling of impermanence? However, Quentin did not choose to do this, perhaps because of his subjective rebellious psychology, he had to adhere to the style formed by "Falling Water Dog", perhaps because of a better structural choice.
If the narrative is normal, the chatter of the two killers before the murder becomes the beginning, so it is not easy for the audience to enter the drama. In the end, Quentin chose the scene of "restaurant robbery discussion" as the beginning. On the one hand, like "Falling Dog", starting with "discussion on robbery" allows the audience to quickly enter the play, simple and direct; on the other hand, Tim Rose is in The film is only used as an interlude, and it will not affect the development of other plots if it is drawn separately as the title. It is worth mentioning that during the opening of the credits, the OST suddenly got stuck, and then changed to another style of music to complete the scene switching from the sound.
As for the end of the movie, what does it mean to insert "a fire accident in a car" and a "restaurant robbery" at the end? Perhaps if it is filmed according to the normal narrative, the movie is clearly divided into two parts, but this is not a movie that emphasizes emotions like "Chongqing Forest", so the plot is easy to be scattered, and there are good sentences and no good chapters. Therefore, by moving part of the plot to the end of the movie, the structure of the movie can be used to avoid the chaos of the plot.
Although the story of the movie has never had any significance for the advancement of the plot, it does not make people feel bored, on the contrary, it is full of all kinds of fun. On the one hand, the existence of dialogue portrays the two people's personalities; on the other hand, it creates a dynamic contrast between violent incidents and creates a sense of absurdity that is nonsense.
Generally speaking, "Pulp Fiction" is fashionable, rebellious, and playful. Although it has immature flaws, it still appeals to movie fans. If Bruce Willis takes a taxi to leave, the outside scene of the taxi is a fake scene from the classical Hollywood period. The evil tastes of these movie fans can impress people who are also movie fans, because movie fans have a heart to make movies.
View more about Pulp Fiction reviews
