Teacher Negative Two has a saying that won my heart:
If it weren't for Nolan's halo, the evaluation of this film would definitely be reduced to the same as "Mission to Mars" and "Sun Catastrophe".
My dissatisfaction with the film is actually only one point-the whole story is based on this catastrophe. Because of a kind of blight, the crops on the earth are all dead, so we have to go to another without this blight. Start again on the planet.
Most viewers who support immigration have no idea about interstellar immigration and planetary transformation projects. Take the last habitable planet as an example. Due to the lack of plants, its sandstorm wind will reach level 12 on the earth, and a sandstorm will last for several months, which is much worse than the earth from which humans have escaped. It's worse than the earth's environment after washing the ground with nuclear bombs. And because it has not yet established a biosphere on the earth, it will take at least several thousand years to transform it into a food-growing system. (The premise is that there are no living things on this planet. If people in the future have built it exactly like the earth, then I didn’t say it, but in this case Nolan will be stinking for thousands of years) Where did humans live during this time? Don’t you want to live underground or in a spaceship? To develop a new planet, it is better to put all the people on the earth on a spaceship to circle around or live underground when the earth’s environment is reformed and then come back.
In fact, if Nolan changes the sun to go out a little bit, or the earth's orbit is getting closer and closer to the sun, it can achieve the effect of the end of the world in the movie, and there is absolutely no way to save it. All science fiction fans will raise their hands to support the escape. And this setback in the movie is just a change of less than 1% of the ecosystem. It is inexplicable to abandon the remaining 99% intact and start rebuilding from 0% on a new planet. Traveling through the interstellar situation is like you are in a hurry to use a car, but unfortunately the door is broken, you say don't repair it, and rebuild a car factory to produce the car. There is such a big gap in engineering on both sides. To transform the environment of the alien planet, the level of technology on the earth must have reached the level that elementary school students can control the global climate. Where does the sandstorm come from?
Because this big bug appeared as soon as it first came up, the whole film fell to the same level as "2012" in terms of seriousness. As for the black hole wall of fire that everyone disputes fiercely, and the engine is rushing, I think it belongs to the minutiae. After all, black holes and engine technology belong to some controversial forward-looking topics, and environmental transformation is a common sense issue with little doubt. Friends who think that it is easier to change the planet than to start from the earth, probably still hold the idea that the steel smelters can conquer the sky with the output of tens of thousands of kilograms per mu in the propaganda a few decades ago, and they have no concept of many basic scientific issues.
Probably Nolan also felt a little overhang. "Interstellar" gave a planet at the end with breathable air. This was too big to hang, and the probability was definitely less than the smallest number the audience could imagine, so it could only Explain that this planet was specially created for humans to live in in the future. This will round out the plot, but it will take at least several thousand years to transform it into a planet that can be used for farming. So I think the best choice for people in the future should be to run back and reopen the base instead of opening points. base.
In this regard, if you are a friend who really loves science fiction, I recommend reading the "Mars Trilogy", a bible about interstellar migration. The author has specifically discussed that extraterrestrial-level technology is already very good relative to Mars. It will take 5,000 years to transform a habitable planet into a planet that can grow food. Normally, it will take more than 300,000 years.
View more about Interstellar reviews
