Although, [Interstellar] must be very mediocre in the eyes of true science fiction and physics lovers.
But after thinking about it, given that the film was steadily handed in the answer sheet, there was no obvious lameness.
After all, Nolan is a structuralist party, and playing scripts is his profession.
Under the coat of entry-level science fiction, the copper-smelly humanistic care wrapped in it is the core of the film, and it is also a weapon for deceiving ordinary moviegoers.
So it's perfectly fine to give seven points, but eight points barely.
But I really can’t get used to Mtime.com’s navy,
a large wave of first-level trumpets, and each post is to paste and copy the same introduction and the same movie-watching experience.
Even, some naval forces directly attached a print propaganda about Mtime.com's ticket package in their direct posts.
[Are you a fool of us, management? Can't you tell that you are a navy? 】
Box office, movies, horror, Hollywood, Godzilla, and so on.
It's all invaded by your navy. Can you ask the navy for a way to survive?
❷[Media Review]
"USA Today": The film is boring, and the advanced special effects technology of the film does not seem to live up to its name.
"Guardian": Interstellar crossing is just a scientific report.
"Forbes": With more than heart, the whole movie is lost in the universe.
"Wall Street Journal": Nolan's 168-minute movie is full of perplexing fallacies.
"The Wrap": 50 points failed. Nolan's sci-fi epic took off perfectly, but crashed when it landed.
"The Playlist": 25 points are terrible, Nolan's "Interstellar" spent millions of dollars to lead the audience to the farthest place in the universe, the film gives the audience feelings immersive but very cheap, these emotions are Heman The company (a famous card retailer in the United States) can provide you with greeting cards.
"Movie city news": The old stalks of science fiction films are used to fool the audience. Although it cannot be said to be a bad film, it is by no means a good one.
"Rotten Tomatoes": A stupid movie, 60% fresh and 40% rotten.
In the general audience's comprehensive scores calculated on the CinemaScore website, "Big Hero 6" got an A, while "Interstellar" got a B+, which is also the autumn and winter file. Disney's animation won the championship and beat Interstellar to the bottom. The biographical film "The Theory of Everything" about physicist Hawking will be a candidate for multiple Oscars this year. The media predicts that "Interstellar" will miss the Oscar.
❸[Tucao]
A wave of naval forces clamored and expressed their feelings to force the party, with a pilgrimage mentality, went to the theater to pay their respects.
Paramount and Warner spent a lot of money on Internet public relations, which has aroused the resentment of foreign movie fans.
It also joined forces with Mtime.com in the Mainland to fuel the flames, hoping that word-of-mouth will spread like a domino.
But really, does this kind of science-level science fiction require you to burn your brain?
Looking at the popular science popularization of Dao Xiong in Calais, isn't it necessary to be promoted to immortality?
To be honest,
half a fan of science fiction, taking a literary bacteria to watch this film, it is an epic worth praising.
Real science fiction fans look at this film, it tastes like chewing wax, and they have to show off the last false sentiment in a crappy way.
View more about Interstellar reviews
