The circular narrative of the film that Quentin has intervened will not come as a surprise. After watching the cinema version and the re-edited version, it is found that the film version is more flavorful. In fact, the whole movie is really surprising and it is probably the flavor. Up.
In fact, it is not unsightly, but although Quentin’s film is out of order, every story is very interesting. It is a picture that can be separated into chapters, and the most pleasing dialogues are often called nonsense dialogues. The feature is that every small segment does not make people lose the excitement of watching it, but Sin City does not have these dialogues. Instead, it is replaced by a large section of inner self-report. The low music is matched with the hard guy who is too deliberate to emphasize. I have to say that I have been in a drama many times.
The performance is of course very good, Bruce Willis is particularly brilliant, but the excessive pursuit of the image of a tough guy is really not suitable for creating a convincing role. Of course, audiences who come to see the aesthetics of violence will not accept softness. The accent, but if the masculine taste of every sentence is overwhelming, it will have a counterproductive effect. A few times I will suddenly feel whether it is actually a neuropathy...
ps Actually, many times I think of the uncle who has been hard-line around Gintama Chapter 100...
View more about Sin City reviews
