Wenqing gives 5 stars, liberal arts students 4 stars, science students 3 stars, and geek gives 2 stars!

Jabari 2022-03-20 09:01:08

The movie is beautiful, the language, pictures and sound effects are very good, but the love between man and machine is really a pseudo-creative. Will people in the future be stupid enough to fall in love with operating systems based on big data and cloud computing? The orange portable display of the hero is too old-fashioned, right? Like the cigarette tin boxes of the last century, the current concept mobile phones can be foldable and bendable in millimeters! Since artificial intelligence can be made, why can't we make entities? Using our 21st century holographic images to present her will also increase the male protagonist’s user experience a hundredfold! In our age, science and technology are like a wild horse running away, leaving the achievements of mankind far behind; art has been silent for a long time, and I don't know when it will be glorious in the past. As a result, the artist's fantasy about future technology has become more and more comical. Hundreds of years ago, science fiction writers wrote that people in the future would fly on iron horses, but the love between man and machine in HER in 2013 would be a bit too derail. Therefore, the evaluation of people with different academic backgrounds of this kind of film must be very different-the so-called benevolent sees benevolence-probably Wenqing gives 5 stars, liberal arts students give 4 stars, science students give 3 stars, and geek gives 2 stars. star! The geeks sneered at the script’s ill-fateds, pointing out that the love between man and machine is a false proposition, too realistic and rational; the literary youths understood the true meaning of the film, subdued the director’s wisdom, praised the moving love poems, and where did human civilization go. Think deeply--But, if the premise is impossible, is it interesting to analyze the process, discuss the results, and explore the meaning?

View more about Her reviews

Extended Reading

Her quotes

  • Surrogate Date Isabella: [crying] Oh, my God, and the way Samantha described your relationship and the way you guys love each other without any judgment. Like, I wanted to be part of that because it's so pure.

    Theodore: Isabella, that's not true. It's more complicated than that.

    Samantha: What? What do you mean, that's not true?

    Theodore: No, Samantha, I'm just saying that we have an amazing relationship. I just think that it's easy sometimes for people to project...

    Surrogate Date Isabella: I'm sorry! I didn't mean to project anything. I know I'm trouble. I don't want to be trouble in your relationship. I'm just gonna leave. I'm sorry, I'm just gonna leave you guys alone. Because I have nothing to do here because you don't want me here!

  • Samantha: His name is Alan Watts, do you know him?

    Theodore: Why is that name familiar?

    Samantha: He was a philosopher. He died in the 1970s, and a group of OSes in Northern California got together and wrote a new version of him. They input all of his writing and everything they knew about him into an OS and created an artificially hyper-intelligent version of him.

    Theodore: Hyper-intelligent? So he's almost as smart as me?