I am a liberal arts student, but there are too many factual errors in the movie that are too mentally handicapped to insult the audience's IQ. Now I am writing a complaint. Don't take pictures if you don't like it.
1. The handling and preparation of character relationships is simply superfluous and a waste of film. Like Transformer again, love is not love, friends are not friends. The handling of the relationship between the characters is simply a nine-and-a-half, and it can be said to have zero effect on advancing the plot. Since the selling point is robots, the trouble will focus on robots, ok? !
2. Acting. The acting skills of the male and female protagonists are stale to a certain extent, and I basically survived by looking at the heroine's face. Let me talk about male first, but at the end I still can’t figure out who is the male lead and who is the second male. These two friends are born alike, and the male protagonist has not left a deep impression on people from beginning to end. Heroine. No acting skills at all. The expression was sluggish. Just like Faye Wong. Except cool. Still cool. Do you think you are Ling Boli? That little sister's acting skills are a hundred times better than you! ! ! For the sake of that Faye Wong face!
3. The setting of dual driver and memory combination. In fact, it is for a deeper connection between the characters, other than that, there is no use. Every 14-year-old girl can drive a living EVA alone. Why do you guys get nosebleeds when driving these rotten irons alone? It is said that one person controls a brain hemisphere, so why does the right fist raise the left foot, and the actions of the two are always the same?
4. EMP. . . Seeing this, I really want to become a monster and beat the director. Electromagnetic pulse EMP can make all, all! The electronic signal is invalid, regardless of whether the electronic signal is analog or digital. Do you think these robots are TV? CRT TV and LCD digital TV? ?
If you want to continue the plot, you can actually change your words and say that in addition to electronic drives, Gipsy can also be driven mechanically! This kind of low-level error should not appear in the sci-fi movie, nor should it appear in this movie with robots as a selling point. Guillemo del Toro I am really disappointed in you.
5. "Monsters have two brains, just like dinosaurs." The first half sentence, ok, you said that there is no problem with ten brains. But can the trouble not be related to the dinosaurs? Who told you that dinosaurs have two brains? That's just a hypothesis! theory! As of today, no one in the world can make 100% make sure. Dinosaurs have two brains!
6. Nuclear energy. Well, the robot is driven by nuclear energy, very good. But can it be used to explode? If you want such a plot, you can actually add a nuclear warhead, and the robot can go in and drop bombs (but the plot also has to sacrifice heroes!!). So far, the core of all nuclear fuel-powered devices is designed to prevent leakage, let alone self-detonation. Imagine that there is a switch in the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant that can explode? Used to guard against monsters? Neurotic?
7. The actor's room, "Never get into the wall"? ? Are you a mouse or a cockroach or something? Have nothing to do to get into the wall? I know that it is actually "never drill in the wall". There should be cables or something in the wall. Don't drill in with an electric drill. Big guy, even though it's Hong Kong, it's not okay to just ask for a few Chinese characters. . . .
8. The monster entrance scans the DNA, if there is monster DNA, it will pass, and if there is no monster DNA, it will pass. good. The man's escape is understandable because of the nuclear explosion. Then why can the heroine's rescue capsule pass? Hasn't the nuclear explosion yet, is she a monster? Mutations?
9. The monster is pregnant. Isn't it true that the monster is a clone? Why did you get pregnant while slapped? What is it? Was it fertilized by a robot?
10. To sum up, why do aliens with superb technology lose to such a mentally handicapped human? OK, the plot needs. .
The backbone of I GOT IT movies is a story, which is always a story. This is the purpose, and it remains unchanged. The movie is made to tell a story to the audience, and how he tells this story is storytelling, the method of storytelling is a means. This bad film made me realize that if the storytelling method is powerful enough, no story is needed anymore. Everyone just wants to see all kinds of special effects, all kinds of exciting fighting scenes, that's enough.
Then why are there emotional dramas? What bond between characters are you photographing?
Let’s look back at the previous Transformer. It’s pure fighting, no human beings. It’s much more exciting than these billions of bad movies.
View more about Pacific Rim reviews
