When everything came to the verdict of guilt or not, a group of verdicts encountered a lot of doubts, but stayed in a closed room without investigating. With more indirect inferences, they denied those who were really not solid. evidence.
After excluding these things that should be done in the court trial, but magically not done in the film, we were surprised to find that a new question lay before us. If all the evidence is 100% direct, why do we need 12 jury members to decide in the house? Let’s follow the NG’s statement: when the suspect is sentenced to NG, no one can assert that he will not continue to endanger the safety of other people in the society.
The admissibility of the jury's judgment has maintained fairness for a while, but it cannot guarantee long-term justice.
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
