Hollywood movies have a large number of crashes each year, but some of this year's crashes are too obvious. The best examples are "The Fall of Olympus" and "Shocking Crisis", which can almost be regarded as twin brothers. The "Landscape of Lost" involved in this article, unfortunately, collided with another sci-fi blockbuster this year, "Return to Earth"-of course, those who have actually watched this film will immediately refute this fact. It is an illusion.
At that time, the trailers of the two movies were launched almost at the same time, and some movies even posted the trailers of the two together. Both trailers are sci-fi movies in which the protagonist is alone facing a deserted planet with a future background. Although the protagonist’s equipment is obviously higher-end and atmospheric, it will still make people appear after watching the trailer. "It's all the same stuff, right?" This feeling. Then, although it is difficult to judge the quality of the film from the trailer, returning to the earth has such terrible elements as Knight Shamaran and Will Smith’s bear child that make people think about it and watch it at the same time. Audiences (such as me) who have posted two trailers are likely to be hinted that both are bad movies. I used to think that when you meet a pig-like opponent, you can wait to abuse the food; but sometimes, your opponent is worse than you but it doesn't necessarily reflect how strong you are. There is a line in the BBC mini-series "The Detective Sherlock": "When you think about it, the IQ of the whole street is lowered." When applied to this, it is "Return to the Earth" and the audience is right in the past year. The expectations of the sci-fi films of China have all been lowered.”
Because of this wrong suggestion at the time, when a friend suggested that I go to the theater to watch the film, I was rudely rejected. Until recently, I heard that many people have rated the film quite well, so I decided to download it and have a look-I think if it is really about the same level as "Return to Earth", then no matter what kind of film critics should be. I can't say it is okay without my conscience. I've seen "A History of War" filmed by the director of the film before, and I feel that although the screen is shocking, the plot is very boring. So before watching this film, it is probably the same level. But this is enough, at least the visual effects of the invasive war era have been several blocks away from "Return to Earth"-the latter belongs to the kind of movie with a bad plot and a bad scene, which is completely useless.
This film very intimately arranged a beautiful partner for Tom to stay on the deserted earth together. If there is a decent female partner beside Smith in the "Re" film, he won't have to be so second, the film is ugly. The degree will also be greatly reduced. But just this level still can’t eliminate the bad intentions that my ill-intentioned audience has brewed before watching the film-I stubbornly believe that this film must be a bad mood after the divorce of Tom's divorce. The film, I can’t wait to make a mockery of its plot. Of course, after reading it, I was beaten in the face with malice.
Until the protagonist faced No. 52, I was still very self-righteous and said to myself, "Well, as I thought, this is an imitation of "Moon"." Then when Tom flew to the console of No. 52, I suddenly realized it. : It turns out to be different from "Moon". That is to stagger the clones in time, this is staggered in space! Sorry! Great setting! I hate it, making people guess wrong~~So shy~~ (Sorry, gaffe) Seeing the reversal of the plot here, I finally surrendered, admitting my self-righteousness and preconceivedness. By then I already knew that the film was worthy of a five-star rating. Although the rhythm of the film is still poor and the previous preparations are too boring, the plot becomes compact as soon as the commander of the Night Watch Corps Morgan Freeman comes on stage. With the excitement of watching the movie brought by the announcement of suspense, the film is definitely of quality. A high-quality sci-fi commercial film with excellent settings and excellent settings.
The biggest surprise of this film is James Lannister who has become a night watchman. This Uncle Beauty is the most active member of the night watchman army in the film except the commander father, and he is a sharpshooter with a mad and cool cock. Having regrown his right hand, an important partner, he can show his combative side again, skillfully playing with (...) all kinds of heavy firearms, and having fun with Brother Tom. At the end of the story, he still upholds the glorious tradition that his family has debts and must taste, in order to repay the self-sacrificing brother Tom, so that his widows and orphans can have a complete home. Looking at the goddess, he never forgot her face, Clone No. 52, which fulfilled his dream of becoming a father. The most wonderful thing is that this kind of like being a father is impossible to identify in a paternity test. I don't know why, I feel that as long as a movie has a plot like being a father at the end, the warmth index will burst in an instant.
Finally, I sincerely hope that the director of this film will be able to make better sci-fi films in the future, and at the same time pay attention to avoiding Knight Shamaran when releasing the trailer.
View more about Oblivion reviews
