But audiences 20 years ago didn’t think so. When they sat in the theater and saw these big guys, real guys, you can imagine the feeling of touching their rough crust, you shivered under their anger— -The movie created another miracle. The children cheered, just like their children cheered at the level 5 Kaiju beast and the "Dangerous Wanderer" mobile phone hunting armor 20 years later. Dreams can be passed on from generation to generation.
Twenty years ago, a traditional stunt was about to die, but when it hasn’t died yet, this usually means a climax. (Technology is always a climax and then dies.) Two years ago, a robot called t1000 from the future just introduced to people how to do special effects in the future-cgi; 10 years later, a robot called "Guru" The ugly thing said that we don’t even need a real-life performance; 17 years later, "Avatar" came; another three years, 20 years later, this film ushered in its re-screening.
I have found that I have always had a misunderstanding. I think that all the dinosaurs in this film are cg, and I knew it was wrong after I watched it again. In fact, most of them are models. This kind of texture can only be found in the real world, even with the current technology. Can't do it. If the Tyrannosaurus is 5 meters high, there is really a 5-meter high thing standing on the set for you to shoot. I am afraid that this kind of scene will never be seen again. very nice. I think I need such a feeling that Hollywood movies are dreams, but they are not all dreams.
The idea of "Jurassic Park", I mean, in the movie, is the kind of thing that makes dreams come true. Children will go to see the Mesozoic land they set foot on in the midnight nightmare. I think this kind of project must be realized on the day when genetic technology can be achieved.
The science and technology world 20 years ago was not the same as it is now. There would not be a group of Minke shouting: "Genetically modified food is poisonous!" At that time, the word "gene" was still far away from us. In fact, many people forget that "Jurassic Park" is a science fiction film, because it is closer to us than interstellar travel and artificial intelligence, and we almost think that it can happen. Therefore, "Jurassic Park" is a very pure "science fiction". It sees where the technology is going, and then imagines what we will do with them if we take the next step. The answer is to resurrect ancient life, and then open a theme park, a genius vision.
Of course we did not go so fast. There is a saying that ethical issues limit the development of modern technology. The interesting thing in the film is that it is the scientist who stops in front of the new power, and the zealous capitalist. This is different from our ordinary people's understanding of scientists. Spielberg loves scientists like Cameron, to make capitalists and lawyers blame. Do you think that female scientist looks like the one in "Alien" and "Avatar", with a strong body, a strong character, and a heroine. The shaping of her is calm. From the beginning "dinosaurs eat men, and then women rule the world", to "come back and settle accounts with your sexism" before turning on the switch, it turns out that this is a feminist.
The movie 20 years ago was like this. It is not in a hurry to throw a bunch of concepts and narrative traps to you, but to shape real people without sullenness. Even if it's a commercial film, it makes you feel very comfortable, instead of being flustered by unorganized fast editing and monotonous electronic music-I love tdk so much, and I don't want to see all movies like it.
I forgot the old craft of "Character Light Arc". The male scientist in "Zhu" went from hating children to liking children, a character change from beginning to end, the dark line is incompatible with modern technology, from being interfered with the movie, to being unable to wear a seat belt-a How can people who love ancient creatures like these things? As he said when he threw away the fossil of the velociraptor toe, everything is "evolving" and we should "extinct". I think if dinosaurs can be chosen, they will definitely not be willing to be resurrected like this. So if "Jurassic Park" can be selected, is it willing to be "3d"?
Of course, maybe don't use the map gun "20 years ago". After all, this is the work of a god-level director like Spielberg. Do you think many characters turn to the camera in the foreground, like "Indiana Jones"?
Watching the movie again, I understand a lot, but it's just "one in and one out", simple clues, but climax. When I entered, the velociraptor, the poisonous dragon, and then the Tyrannosaurus rex, all were not seen. Everyone was overwhelmed by the emotions of the winding dragon before entering the park, and then saw the triceratops, and then the plot Reverse, Tyrannosaurus came, cannibalized people, destroyed cars, poisonous dragons came, cannibalized people, destroyed cars, Velociraptors came, cannibalized people, entered the house, and forced people to death, all were crushed, but not completely Disappearing, waiting for a gust of wind to start a prairie fire, the emotions are all stimulated, forming a "ring", what a sophisticated narrative!
Spielberg's grasp of audiovisual language will not be mentioned here, but can only be described as "can't fault a little bit". I paid special attention to a few details. The so-called "visual wonder" was not built by stunts. One was when the children were eating in the house, the Velociraptor came quietly. There were pictures of Velociraptors on the walls of the house. The colors were bright. The shadows of real Velociraptors were alluding to the walls, overlapping with the images in their paintings. On the same wall; Velociraptor chased humans to the hall. There were huge dinosaur skeletons in the hall. They fought on the dinosaur skeleton. Finally, Tyrannosaurus rex appeared and ate the Velociraptor and destroyed all the dinosaur skeletons. There was also Velociraptor. Chasing the computer center, the light of the screen hits it, and there is a bunch of genetic sequences on the screen, as if the image of this dinosaur is just an imaginary image composed of subtitles representing the genetic sequence. There is too much to say about the meaning of these imaginative pictures and their expressiveness.
And don’t forget, this is a horror movie, which is meant to scare people. Are people scared? Yes. People 20 years later are also scared. Watching "Jurassic Park" is just to make up for a broken childhood. I did not expect that this is a movie that will not be outdated. It can be regarded as the latest Hollywood share-sharing blockbuster without the slightest sense of obsolescence-even in Blu-ray. The obvious film grain is gone.
In the movie, the dinosaurs went extinct tens of millions of years ago, and then they were cloned again to scare people; in reality, the movie was released 20 years ago, and then they were 3d words to scare people. Whether they like it or not, they play tricks on time. The title of this article is the name of a piece of music in "Tracks in the Sky", the title song of the Prince Olivet of the Ereponia Empire, dedicated to those who are wrapped in amber because they are eternal.
As a mathematician said, life itself will find its own way out. Once everything is sorted out in the historical dimension, it is a "live long and prosper", a journey of endless and courageous advancement. Biology is constantly evolving, with new species replacing old species; movies also have its "evolution", new technology, and new audition language. In such a magnificent journey, it is a pity that our small and short lives can only share a small and short period of time. So we hope that the old will defeat the new. We resurrected the dinosaurs and re-screened the movie to prove that something can be eternal. This is our amber love.
20130821
View more about Jurassic Park reviews
