Respond to Mr. S's complaint here:
1 Too much: Human flesh marbles, awesome physique.
This is the role setting. Superman is so strong. Among the many heroes of the Justice League, Superman should set an upper limit for super powers. This super effect reflects the "real" under the premise of the character setting. Mr. S complains about the character setting, it is better to complain about Sun Wukong, why he is a monkey and has seventy-two changes.
2 Too messy: The plot is broken and inexplicable.
The plot of this film is so simple that it can't be simpler, even the broken minimum is not counted, I don't know why it is inexplicable, and even the two great gods are incomprehensible.
3 The female pig is too weak.
The female pig is indeed a supporting role, because the end of the film is the starting point of the traditional Superman story. Clark's finally entered the newspaper and put on glasses.
4Ad placement.
There is no way to burn money with special effects.
5 "Forcing the grid to be too high", a fake model, big and empty.
In the DC universe, Superman's personal abilities are too strong. In order to balance the abilities of various superheroes, the comics weaken his rationality and give him a very high sense of morality. Therefore, Superman tends to have a problem, he is a real person, and is born with a feeling of "great love", so he is easy to be used, and even used by the government as a tool of war. If this super talent has super IQ and lacks moral self-control, wouldn't it be extremely dangerous, and others don't want to live. . .
6 The dilemma is too boring.
I personally think that Superman will never have a dilemma, he is a pure ideal model dedicated to the people. The only possible choice should be in the realm of legal power. For any villain, Superman will never be a killer. He will be arrested and brought to the court for trial. Therefore, it also gives those villains countless opportunities to escape from prison. In the end, this film should not be a killer move. , Zod is not so easy to hang up.
7 Mr. S seems to be a plot-centricist, and a weak plot can kill the hard work of the entire film production team.
I don't agree with this point, but I can't object to it. I personally prefer to understand film as an integrated art and comprehensively evaluate it from all angles. The simplicity of the plot is indeed the weakness of the Schneider Superman movie, but it is also the difficulty of making Superman movies. For a guy who basically has no weaknesses and basically will not die, and his personality is inherently extraterrestrial, how to arrange the plot, I suggest Mr. S You can think about this question.
8 The film values are false.
Mr. S believes that the realistic soil of film values is lacking, "Where is there a person who shoulders the hope of the people?", "It's just that in such a fragmented era, how can he afford such a heavy color?". Mr. S denies the movie itself with the unreality of the film's values (rather than the quality of the values). Mr. S once said that he must work hard to understand the values of the movie. It seems that he has not understood, but he has already judged, and judged to see how far the movie deviates from his own personal opinions. To put it bluntly, it is to see how much the movie is. rotten.
9 Viewpoint: Compared with Superman, "Little Times" is rotten but there must be a market.
Mr. S frankly, Mr. Guo Jingming found himself through. Yes, it is clear that material desires are real, the market, and what everyone needs. ——In other words, what everyone needs is not good things, but realistic things. Mr. S successfully denied the idealized heroism with "out-of-time". Indeed, ideal is a fart, and a hero is a fart, who expects to be saved. . . .
10 Viewpoint: The confusion of values has caused material desires to grow wildly.
Indeed, Mr. S took the crazy growth of material desires as the criterion for the evaluation of values, and all those that were not in line with the trend were eliminated, and the world suddenly became quiet. . . The existence of the ideal type of fake Daquan like Superman is no longer worthwhile. If you come out and mix things up, you are willing to be a money-making tool for film companies.
11 Viewpoint: Superman should go home and rest!
Mr. S finally returned to the film and tried to make a decision from the standpoint of Superman. The conclusion is that Superman should accept his fate. This world is the virtue. No matter how hard you work, no one cares about you. . . . It sounds familiar to me, don’t Superman’s enemies think so?
12 In the endnotes, Mr. S used gibberish and superficial views as a shield, "privatizing" what he said, effectively retaining the right to interpret the possible consequences of his views, and using clever means.
View more about Man of Steel reviews
