Movies should have something to say, and if you want to say something, you have to make choices and trade-offs. Movies are no better than novels. There is not so much time for you to squander. The beauty of the movie is that it shows the ultimate excitement in a short time.
This film seems to me: I want to talk about everything, but time is limited, so I can only talk about everything a little bit. Excuse me, what's the point? ? You either act, or art, or politics, or growth, or humanity, or life. There are tens of thousands of things that can be said in the world, and there are thousands of reasons. The movie is only a short 2h, just pick one or two. Why do you have to cover everything? There is an old Chinese saying that if you are too greedy, you can't chew it badly. Please study and refer to it.
The original is said to be very good, I haven't read it, so it's not good to comment. But as far as the movie is concerned, I think it's very bad.
First, the time distribution is unreasonable. In all fairness, the presentation of the world view from the previous hour was good, but it was too long! After the addition, the part of the game is hard to pass, and the whole film is almost like a cloud after watching it. I think that many background descriptions can be streamlined. If you don’t want to streamline it, you can also intersperse it in the game, using the protagonist’s memories or parallel timelines to explain it. The connection between the background and the background, the second is too lack of technical content, it is a pity that the background setting is a bit worthwhile.
Second, without the protagonist’s psychological description, many plots are abrupt and weird. I think there should be a detailed description of the protagonist’s psychological thoughts and changes in the novel. How to show these psychological activities in the movie is the skill of the screenwriter and director. As someone who has never read the original, I am very disappointed with the play. Because one didn't narrate, two didn't borrow a supporting role, and three didn't have the protagonist's expression, I didn't see any psychological changes.
Third, the plot of the so-called survival game is too weak. Speaking of the scene of Honeycomb, I almost knelt when I saw it. Can I say it's so weak?
The hostess had burns on her leg and she was climbing a tree, okay, to escape, I accepted it.
A fierce man from behind followed closely, yelling "I won't let you go", and then started climbing the tree and chasing him with a knife in his hand... Isn't it inevitable that these two kinds of goods will fall down the tree? Do you catch up with someone and then draw the knife, or can't you put your trousers off for now?
The female lead climbed high, and these mentally handicapped besiegers actually obeyed the male lead’s suggestion and decided to wait under the tree. Okay, I will bear this too, just treat you as saving weapons. But in the middle of the night, there is not even a night watch, a group of people sleep like camping? The hostess is completely not afraid of siege under the tree, not to mention the smell of sleeping with a rope, and the group of people under the tree are about to sleep with bubbles. Please! Everyone! Survival game! Don’t kill the heroine and win! Only one can live in the end! One less competitor is one! Either you die or I die! Are you so confident in this temporary minor league? In this kind of situation where the night is dark and the wind is high, you should be a little bit more minded, and be a little wary of the so-called alliance, the heroine, and the true surrender. Okay! Actually all fell asleep, I mean you are stupid, stupid or stupid! ? If the original is also written in this way, then in my opinion, the original work with the flavor of Mary Su who wrote the supporting roles as brains in order to highlight the heroine is not very good.
Not to mention that in the end the hostess went to cut the branch where the honeycomb was located, and cut it when she went up! I know you are the protagonist with a golden body, but if you don't cover your hands, can you cover your face? Do you still need to teach you the basic protective measures for the childhood activity of poking a beehive? Someone said that this play was the best, 囧! Excuse me, what's so good about it! ! where! ! !
In the end, many people said that the female lead was good, but I really didn't see it. What's so good about this kind of expressionless performance? Is it possible to know poker face and parkour? At the end of the presidential awards, she had an expression. The expression in her eyes was no different from that she wanted to shave her life away, but should she act like this in the end? Is it normal for a girl who is acting in the spirit of acting as long as she can go home safely, and can start acting as soon as she enters the survival game, and finally faces the boss, but her emotions are so exposed, is it normal?
View more about The Hunger Games reviews
