Changing times

Lessie 2022-03-22 09:01:11

As a 50th anniversary gift, Bond 23 has struggled between "tradition" and "innovation" from beginning to end: young Q, pragmatic military supplies department, change of M, Heineken replaced Shake Martini, Aspen The destruction of Dun Martin and Skydome Manor; the above information, including the information revealed between the lines and the overall effect, is always reminding the arrival of the new 007 era. It is enough to use anti-tradition to pay tribute to tradition while opening up new fields.

Rosemarie 2022-03-22 09:01:11

Bini was right. The five 007s of Daniel Craig gave Bond a psychological depth, but it also made the film ordinary. According to my understanding, Daniel Craig is a working class 007, no matter in appearance, style, or ideology, it is closer to ordinary people in the 21st century. Under his silent appearance, his heart is madly calling for feelings, calling for family life, calling from female colleagues to opponents to audiences all over the world to conduct a psychological analysis of himself, calling for a pair of people who can work under pressure and get off work. You have to wait for the not-easy understanding from the bottom of your heart that the leader and girlfriend's Chaogang requires. It’s okay to say that realism returns, but I think I’m still doing what the 007 series has always done: to cater to the times. Daniel Craig's 007, one is to cater to female consumers: the male protagonist is strong on the outside but crisp in the middle, which is pitiful, and the female characters are also quite skilled and do not need male help. The second is to cater to the world view of the workers: I used to think that I would become 007, but now I discovered that 007 is the other me. In a word, it is not easy.